Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19682405›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2009

GPs' awareness of patients' preference for place of death.

Koen Meeussen, Lieve Van den Block, Nathalie Bossuyt, Johan Bilsen, Michael Echteld, Viviane Van Casteren, Luc Deliens

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Caring for older people: is home care always best?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Living in uncertain times: trajectories to death in residential care homes.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  17. End-of-life care--what do cancer patients want?Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Koen MeeussenEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. koen.meeussen@vub.ac.be
Lieve Van den Block
Nathalie Bossuyt
Johan Bilsen
Michael Echteld
Viviane Van Casteren
Luc Deliens

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeing able to die in one's place of choice is an indicator of the quality of end-of-life care. GPs may play a key role in exploring and honouring patients' preferences for place of death.

aimTo examine how often GPs are informed about patients' preferred place of death, by whom and for which patients, and to study the expressed preferred place of death and how often patients die at their preferred place. DESIGN OF STUDY: One-year nationwide mortality retrospective study.

settingSentinel Network of GPs in Belgium, 2006.

methodGPs' weekly registration of all deaths (patients aged =1 year).

resultsA total of 798 non-sudden deaths were reported. GPs were informed of patients' preferred place of death in 46% of cases. GPs obtained this information directly from patients in 63%. GP awareness was positively associated with patients not being hospitalised in the last 3 months of life (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8 to 5.6), involvement of informal caregivers (OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.8 to 6.1), use of a multidisciplinary palliative care team (OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.8 to 3.5), and with presence of more than seven contacts between GP and patient or family in the last 3 months of life (OR = 3.0; 95% CI = 2.2 to 4.3). In instances where GPs were informed, more than half of patients (58%) preferred to die at home. Overall, 80% of patients died at their preferred place.

conclusionGPs are often unaware of their patients' preference for place of death. However, if GPs are informed, patients often die at their preferred location. Several healthcare characteristics might contribute to this and to a higher level of GP awareness.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathFamily PracticePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelBelgiumChildChild, PreschoolChoice BehaviorEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID19682405
PMCPMC2734354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.