Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19682098›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2010

Exciting but exhausting: experiences with participatory research with chronically ill adolescents.

Anneloes van Staa, Susan Jedeloo, Jos M Latour, Margo J Trappenburg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Characterizing research partnerships in child health research: A scoping review.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Co-production of health and social science research with vulnerable children and young people: A rapid review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A self-portrait: Design opportunities for a tool that supports children's involvement in brain-related health care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  12. Including the voice of paediatric patients: Cocreation of an engagement game.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  13. Evaluating meaningful impact of Patient and Public Involvement: A Q methodology study among researchers and young people with a chronic condition.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  14. Adolescent and young adult patients as co-researchers: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient and Public Involvement of young people with a chronic condition in projects in health and social care: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Patient involvement in qualitative data analysis in a trial of a patient-centred intervention: Reconciling lay knowledge and scientific method.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anneloes van StaaExpertise Centre Transitions of Care, Rotterdam University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. vanstaa@bmg.eur.nl
Susan Jedeloo
Jos M Latour
Margo J Trappenburg
Boston Children's Hospital · USRotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents with chronic conditions are major users of paediatric hospitals, but seldom participate in the evaluation of services or in research. Little is known about the usefulness of the participatory approach in adolescent health research.

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, benefits and limitations of a participatory research (PR) project involving chronically ill adolescents as co-researchers. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsNine adolescents, aged 15-17 years, acted as co-researchers in a hospital-based PR project. They co-developed an interview protocol and during a disco party held for this purpose interviewed each other and 25 fellow patients (12-19 years). They provided advice on the draft report and participated in the dissemination of the results, but were not involved in the design of the project or analysis of results.

resultsInvolving adolescents in participatory health research was feasible and appreciated by researchers and youth alike, but had its drawbacks too. The peer-research attracted few participants, the interviews lacked depth and did not yield substantial new insights. Maintaining a high level of participation of the chronically ill co-researchers also proved difficult.

conclusionsAdolescents with chronic conditions like to have a say in the design and evaluation of hospital services. But their participation as co-researchers demands ample resources from all parties involved without automatically improving research quality. PR does not seem the most effective and efficient way to make services more responsive. We therefore recommend further exploration of other creative and sustainable ways for involving youth in health-care service development and innovation.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseHealth Services ResearchPatient ParticipationAdolescentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNetherlandsQuality of Health CareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19682098
PMCPMC5060512
OpenAlexW2119666565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.