ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2009
Ruling out novel H1N1 influenza virus infection with direct fluorescent antigen testing.
Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia and diagnostic yields of microbiological methods: a 3-year prospective study in Norway.BMC infectious diseases · 2015Trial
- Electrochemical and optical biosensors as transformative tools for multiplex detection of influenza viruses.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Advances in Diagnostic Techniques for Influenza Virus Infection: A Comprehensive Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Review
- Testing for SARS-CoV-2: lessons learned and current use cases.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- A Rapid, Accurate, Single Molecule Counting Method Detects Clostridium difficile Toxin B in Stool Samples.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Tools to detect influenza virus.Yonsei medical journal · 2013Review
- Emergency Physicians' Adherence to Center for Disease Control and Prevention Guidance During the 2009 Influenza A H1N1 Pandemic.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2013Article
- Comparison of Xpert Flu rapid nucleic acid testing with rapid antigen testing for the diagnosis of influenza A and B.Journal of virological methods · 2012Article
- Evaluation and management of seasonal influenza in the emergency department.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2012Article
- Two years after pandemic influenza A/2009/H1N1: what have we learned?Clinical microbiology reviews · 2012Review
- Microfluidic chip for molecular amplification of influenza A RNA in human respiratory specimens.PloS one · 2012Article
- Article
- Direct fluorescent-antibody testing followed by culture for diagnosis of 2009 H1N1 influenza A.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2011Article
- Evaluation of direct immunofluorescence test with PCR for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus during 2009 pandemic.Yonsei medical journal · 2011Article
- Infections in hemodialysis: a concise review - Part 1: bacteremia and respiratory infections.Hippokratia · 2011Article
- Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection in patients with hematologic malignancy.Emerging infectious diseases · 2010Article
- Evaluation of diagnostic applications of monoclonal antibodies against avian influenza H7 viruses.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2010Article
- Understanding the Influenza A H1N1 2009 Pandemic.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2010Article
- Rapid antigen test for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus.Emerging infectious diseases · 2010Article
- Public hospital-based laboratory experience during an outbreak of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infections.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated the ability of direct fluorescent antigen (DFA) influenza tests to identify novel H1N1 influenza virus. DFA results were compared with polymerase chain reaction results. The negative predictive value of DFA testing was at least 96%. Therefore, when performed on specimens of adequate quality, DFA tests can effectively rule out infection due to novel H1N1 virus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.