ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2009
Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: management and procedure.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adult Clinical Perfusion Practice Survey: 2020 results.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2023Article
- Using machine learning to predict perfusionists' critical decision-making during cardiac surgery.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization · 2022Article
- Is Conventional Bypass for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery a Misnomer?The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2018Article
- Global Cardioplegia Practices: Results from the Global Cardiopulmonary Bypass Survey.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2018Article
- A 2013 Survey on Pressure Monitoring in Adult Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits: Modes and Applications.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2014Article
- D'où venons-nous/que somes nous/où allons nous? Accidents are inevitable.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2012Article
- Observation and participation.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2009Article
- A survey of practices during cardiopulmonary bypass in India: An Indian association of cardiovascular and thoracic anesthesiologist endeavor.Annals of cardiac anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this report, we will discuss management and procedural aspects of perfusion practice. This report allows us to compare and contrast recent trends and changes in perfusion with historic practices. A survey comprised of 233 single-answer and 12 open-ended questions was sent by e-mail to senior perfusionists or individuals in charge of perfusion in 40 hospital groups. The survey encompasses a review of the perfusion practices for the calendar year of 2003, and respondents were required to answer the survey based on the predominant practice in their institutions. Standard management of routine adult cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in 2003 consisted of perfusion strategies that achieved a target temperature of 32.0 degrees C (range, 28.0-35.0 degrees C), a flow index of 2.4 L/min/m2 (range, 1.6-3.0 L/min/m2) during normothermia and 1.8 L/min/m2 (range, 1.2-3.0 L/min/m2) during hypothermia, and a pressure during CPB between 50 (range, 30-65 mmHg) and 70 mmHg (range, 60-95 mmHg). Myocardial protection with blood cardioplegia was used in 77% of the 20,688 CPB cases, whereas in 53% cases, cardiotomy blood was never processed. Pre-operatively, 76% of perfusion groups assessed their patients (21% directly with the patient), and 85% responded that perfusionists performed or participated in a formal pre-bypass checklist. The majority of the perfusion groups used a handwritten perfusion record (62%), 12% used an electronic perfusion record, and 26% used both, whereas more than one half of the groups were involved in quality assurance (79%), incident reporting (74%), audits (62%), research (53%), participating in interdisciplinary meetings (53%), and morbidity and mortality meetings (65%). Only 26% conducted formal perfusion team meetings. This report outlines the status of clinical management and procedural performance for perfusion practices in Australia and New Zealand in 2003. Awareness of these trends will allow perfusionists to assess both individual practices and unit performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19681302PMC4680208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.