Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19681302›Full record

ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2009

Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: management and procedure.

Sigrid C Tuble, Timothy W Willcox, Robert A Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adult Clinical Perfusion Practice Survey: 2020 results.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2023
    Article
  2. Using machine learning to predict perfusionists' critical decision-making during cardiac surgery.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observation and participation.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2009
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sigrid C TubleFlinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Timothy W Willcox
Robert A Baker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this report, we will discuss management and procedural aspects of perfusion practice. This report allows us to compare and contrast recent trends and changes in perfusion with historic practices. A survey comprised of 233 single-answer and 12 open-ended questions was sent by e-mail to senior perfusionists or individuals in charge of perfusion in 40 hospital groups. The survey encompasses a review of the perfusion practices for the calendar year of 2003, and respondents were required to answer the survey based on the predominant practice in their institutions. Standard management of routine adult cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in 2003 consisted of perfusion strategies that achieved a target temperature of 32.0 degrees C (range, 28.0-35.0 degrees C), a flow index of 2.4 L/min/m2 (range, 1.6-3.0 L/min/m2) during normothermia and 1.8 L/min/m2 (range, 1.2-3.0 L/min/m2) during hypothermia, and a pressure during CPB between 50 (range, 30-65 mmHg) and 70 mmHg (range, 60-95 mmHg). Myocardial protection with blood cardioplegia was used in 77% of the 20,688 CPB cases, whereas in 53% cases, cardiotomy blood was never processed. Pre-operatively, 76% of perfusion groups assessed their patients (21% directly with the patient), and 85% responded that perfusionists performed or participated in a formal pre-bypass checklist. The majority of the perfusion groups used a handwritten perfusion record (62%), 12% used an electronic perfusion record, and 26% used both, whereas more than one half of the groups were involved in quality assurance (79%), incident reporting (74%), audits (62%), research (53%), participating in interdisciplinary meetings (53%), and morbidity and mortality meetings (65%). Only 26% conducted formal perfusion team meetings. This report outlines the status of clinical management and procedural performance for perfusion practices in Australia and New Zealand in 2003. Awareness of these trends will allow perfusionists to assess both individual practices and unit performance.

Indexed as

AustraliaCardiopulmonary BypassCirculatory Arrest, Deep Hypothermia InducedData CollectionHeart Arrest, InducedHumansNew ZealandPerfusionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID19681302
PMCPMC4680208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.