ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2009
Desensitisation of native and recombinant human urotensin-II receptors.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human urotensin-II (U-II) is an 11-amino-acid cyclic peptide that activates a G(q)-coupled receptor named UT. Little is known about the desensitisation profile of this receptor as peptide binding is essentially irreversible. In the present study, we have examined the effects of U-II and carbachol on Ca(2+) signalling in SJCRH30 rhabdomyosarcoma (receptor density, B(max) approximately 0.1 pmol/mg protein) and human embroynic kidney (HEK)(hUT) (B(max) approximately 1.4 pmol/mg protein) cells expressing native and recombinant UT, respectively. In SJCRH30, HEK(hUT) and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced to express native UT by treatment with 2 microg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS), we have measured the effects of U-II treatment on UT mRNA. In SJCRH30 cells, primary stimulation with carbachol (250 microM) did not affect a secondary challenge with U-II (1 microM) and primary challenge with U-II did not affect a secondary challenge with carbachol. In contrast, in HEK(hUT) cells, primary stimulation with carbachol (250 microM) reduced a secondary challenge to U-II (1 microM) by 84% and primary challenge with U-II reduced a secondary challenge to carbachol by 76%. Pre-treatment of SJCRH30 cells with U-II reduced UT mRNA after 6 h and this returned to basal after 24 h. In recombinant HEK(hUT) cells, UT mRNA expression increased following a 6 h treatment with 1 microM U-II. U-II treatment of naïve un-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells was without effect. However, when UT expression is up-regulated following 15 h of LPS treatment, a 6 h U-II challenge reduced UT mRNA by 66%. In summary, we report differences in the desensitisation profiles of native and recombinant U-II receptors. Design and interpretation of functional experiments are hampered by irreversibility of U-II binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.