Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19680619›Full record

ReviewDie Naturwissenschaften2009

A comparative approach to the principal mechanisms of different memory systems.

Ludger Rensing, Michael Koch, Annette Becker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ludger RensingDepartment of Biology, University of Bremen, 28334, Bremen, Germany. rensing@uni-bremen.de
Michael Koch
Annette Becker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term "memory" applies not only to the preservation of information in neuronal and immune systems but also to phenomena observed for example in plants, single cells, and RNA viruses. We here compare the different forms of information storage with respect to possible common features. The latter may be characterized by (1) selection of pre-existing information, (2) activation of memory systems often including transcriptional, and translational, as well as epigenetic and genetic mechanisms, (3) subsequent consolidation of the activated state in a latent form (standby mode), and (4) reactivation of the latent state of memory systems when the organism is exposed to the same (or conditioned) signal or to previous selective constraints. These features apparently also exist in the "evolutionary memory," i.e., in evolving populations which have highly variable mutant spectra.

Indexed as

AnimalsAssociation LearningAvoidance LearningB-LymphocytesCell Physiological PhenomenaHistonesImmunologic MemoryMemoryModels, NeurologicalNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsPlant Physiological PhenomenaRNA VirusesT-LymphocytesHistonesNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.