Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19680578›Full record

ReviewLab on a chip2009

Characterizing dispersion in microfluidic channels.

Subhra Datta, Sandip Ghosal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab on a chip, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New regimes of dispersion in microfluidics as mediated by travelling temperature waves.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dispersion of a Nanoliter Bolus in Microfluidic Co-Flow.Journal of micromechanics and microengineering : structures, devices, and systems · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Analytical and biological methods for probing the blood-brain barrier.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2012
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Subhra DattaMechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, 201, W 19th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. datta.20@osu.edu
Sandip Ghosal

Funding

One dimensional transport equations for CE systems by asymptotic homogenizationR01EB007596 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GHOSAL, SANDIP · 2007 to 2009
$315k
NIBIB NIH HHS 5R01EB007596-02NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dispersion or spreading of analyte bands is a barrier to achieving high resolution in microfluidic separations. The role of dispersion in separations is reviewed with emphasis on metrics, sources and common principles of analysis. Three sources of dispersion (a) inhomogeneous flow fields, (b) solute wall interactions and (c) force fields normal to channel walls are studied in detail. Microfluidic and nanofluidic applications to capillary electrophoresis, chromatography and field-flow fractionation, that are subject to one or more of these three physical processes under standard, unintentional or novel operating conditions, are discussed.

Indexed as

Microfluidics

Identifiers

PMID19680578
PMCPMC2814782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.