Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19680555›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Diversity and strain specificity of plant cell wall degrading enzymes revealed by the draft genome of Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1.

Margret E Berg Miller, Dionysios A Antonopoulos, Marco T Rincon, Mark Band, Albert Bari, Tatsiana Akraiko, Alvaro Hernandez, Jyothi Thimmapuram, Bernard Henrissat, Pedro M Coutinho and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Preventive effect ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Designing chimeric enzymes inspired by fungal cellulosomes.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Marsupial Gut Microbiome.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Margret E Berg MillerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Dionysios A Antonopoulos
Marco T Rincon
Mark Band
Albert Bari
Tatsiana Akraiko
Alvaro Hernandez
Jyothi Thimmapuram
Bernard Henrissat
Pedro M Coutinho
Ilya Borovok
Sadanari Jindou
Raphael Lamed
Harry J Flint
Edward A Bayer
Bryan A White
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USTel Aviv University · ILCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Aberdeen · GBWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRuminococcus flavefaciens is a predominant cellulolytic rumen bacterium, which forms a multi-enzyme cellulosome complex that could play an integral role in the ability of this bacterium to degrade plant cell wall polysaccharides. Identifying the major enzyme types involved in plant cell wall degradation is essential for gaining a better understanding of the cellulolytic capabilities of this organism as well as highlighting potential enzymes for application in improvement of livestock nutrition and for conversion of cellulosic biomass to liquid fuels. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe R. flavefaciens FD-1 genome was sequenced to 29x-coverage, based on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis estimates (4.4 Mb), and assembled into 119 contigs providing 4,576,399 bp of unique sequence. As much as 87.1% of the genome encodes ORFs, tRNA, rRNAs, or repeats. The GC content was calculated at 45%. A total of 4,339 ORFs was detected with an average gene length of 918 bp. The cellulosome model for R. flavefaciens was further refined by sequence analysis, with at least 225 dockerin-containing ORFs, including previously characterized cohesin-containing scaffoldin molecules. These dockerin-containing ORFs encode a variety of catalytic modules including glycoside hydrolases (GHs), polysaccharide lyases, and carbohydrate esterases. Additionally, 56 ORFs encode proteins that contain carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs). Functional microarray analysis of the genome revealed that 56 of the cellulosome-associated ORFs were up-regulated, 14 were down-regulated, 135 were unaffected, when R. flavefaciens FD-1 was grown on cellulose versus cellobiose. Three multi-modular xylanases (ORF01222, ORF03896, and ORF01315) exhibited the highest levels of up-regulation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The genomic evidence indicates that R. flavefaciens FD-1 has the largest known number of fiber-degrading enzymes likely to be arranged in a cellulosome architecture. Functional analysis of the genome has revealed that the growth substrate drives expression of enzymes predicted to be involved in carbohydrate metabolism as well as expression and assembly of key cellulosomal enzyme components.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBiocatalysisCell WallEnzymesGene Expression ProfilingGenome, BacterialMolecular Sequence DataOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRuminococcusSpecies SpecificityEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID19680555
PMCPMC2721979
OpenAlexW2002499141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.