Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19679558›Full record

ArticleNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2010

Comparison of methods for estimating glomerular filtration rate in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

Josée Bouchard, Etienne Macedo, Sharon Soroko, Glenn M Chertow, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Talat Alp Ikizler, Emil P Paganini, Ravindra L Mehta, Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Josée BouchardDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Etienne Macedo
Sharon Soroko
Glenn M Chertow
Jonathan Himmelfarb
Talat Alp Ikizler
Emil P Paganini
Ravindra L Mehta
Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease
University of California San Diego · USCleveland Clinic · USStanford University · USUniversity of Washington · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Mentoring Patient-Oriented Clinical Investigators in NephrologyK24DK085446 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERTOW, GLENN MATTHEW · 2010 to 2022
$1.4M
PREDICTING AND IMPROVING OUTCOMES IN ACUTE RENAL FAILURER01DK053412 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI MEHTA, RAVINDRA L. · 1998 to 2001
$1.2M
NUTRITION AND METABOLISM IN ACUTE RENAL FAILURER01DK053413 · NIDDK · MAINE MEDICAL CENTER · PI HIMMELFARB, JONATHAN · 1998 to 2001
$550k
ICU ARF DIALYSIS DOSE QUANTIFICATION AND PATIENT OUTCOMER01DK053411 · NIDDK · CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION · PI PAGANINI, EMIL · 1998 to 2001
$489k
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK085446NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK53411NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK53412NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK53413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, estimates of kidney function are used to modify drug dosing, adjust nutritional therapy and provide dialytic support. However, estimating glomerular filtration rate is challenging due to fluctuations in kidney function, creatinine production and fluid balance. We hypothesized that commonly used glomerular filtration rate prediction equations overestimate kidney function in patients with acute kidney injury and that improved estimates could be obtained by methods incorporating changes in creatinine generation and fluid balance.

methodsWe analysed data from a multicentre observational study of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. We identified 12 non-dialysed, non-oliguric patients with consecutive increases in creatinine for at least 3 and up to 7 days who had measurements of urinary creatinine clearance. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated by Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, Jelliffe equation and Jelliffe equation with creatinine adjusted for fluid balance (Modified Jelliffe) and compared to measured urinary creatinine clearance.

resultsGlomerular filtration rate estimated by Jelliffe and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation correlated best with urinary creatinine clearances. Estimated glomerular filtration rate by Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Jelliffe overestimated urinary creatinine clearance was 80%, 33%, 10%, respectively, and Modified Jelliffe underestimated GFR by 2%.

conclusionIn patients with acute kidney injury, glomerular filtration rate estimating equations can be improved by incorporating data on creatinine generation and fluid balance. A better assessment of glomerular filtration rate in acute kidney injury could improve evaluation and management and guide interventions.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAcute Kidney InjuryAdultAgedCreatinineFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidneyKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalWater-Electrolyte BalanceCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID19679558
PMCPMC2910324
OpenAlexW2142406086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.