Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19679009›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2009

New agents in acute myeloid leukemia: beyond cytarabine and anthracyclines.

Amir T Fathi, Judith E Karp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Targeting Transcription Factors for Cancer Treatment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amir T FathiDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1650 Orleans Street, CRB 1 Room 289, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Judith E Karp
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

PHASE I TRIALS OF ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA069854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI EDELMAN, MARTIN J · 1995 to 2002
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard therapeutic approaches for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) continue to be based on anthracyclines and cytarabine. However, the prognosis for AML remains poor, especially for patients with high-risk disease. During the past decade, promising novel agents that target DNA replication and repair, as well as cell cycling and apoptosis, have been developed and are being actively investigated in AML. Among these agents is flavopiridol, which interferes with key steps of the cell cycle and effectively promotes cell death, and voreloxin, an intercalating agent that also targets topoisomerase II. Also under clinical study in AML are oligonucleotide antisense constructs, which suppress the translation of proteins essential for leukemic blast survival and proliferation, and agents that target antiapoptotic cascades. In summary, it is hoped that novel therapies such as these will augment and/or supplant our current cytarabine- and anthracycline-based approaches, overcome active drug-resistance pathways, and eventually improve outcomes for patients with AML.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell CycleCytarabineFlavonoidsHumansLeukemia, MyeloidPiperidinesalvocidibAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic AgentsCytarabineFlavonoidsPiperidines

Identifiers

PMID19679009
PMCPMC3066101
OpenAlexW1978547620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.