ReviewHead & neck oncology2009
Xenograft models of head and neck cancers.
Review in Head & neck oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Porphyrin-lipid nanotheranostics for multimodal imaging of nodal disease in preclinical oral cancers.Theranostics · 2026Article
- Preclinical models in the study of lymph node metastasis.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025Review
- Article
- Tongue orthotopic xenografts to study fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma invasion and metastasis in live animals.Cell reports methods · 2024Article
- Fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma orthotopic tongue xenografts for study of invasion, intravasation and metastasis in live animals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Identification of acquired Notch3 dependency in metastatic Head and Neck Cancer.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Mutant p53 drives an immune cold tumor immune microenvironment in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Targeted Hsp70 fluorescence molecular endoscopy detects dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- CXCR4 peptide-based fluorescence endoscopy in a mouse model of Barrett's esophagus.EJNMMI research · 2022Article
- Aberrant methylation‑mediated decrease of lncRNA HNF1A‑AS1 contributes to malignant progression of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma via EMT.Oncology reports · 2020Observational
- Ex Vivo Culture Models to Indicate Therapy Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cells · 2020Review
- Loss of Estrogen Receptors is Associated with Increased Tumor Aggression in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- CXCR7 promotes migration and invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by upregulating TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- One-bead one-compound combinatorial library derived targeting ligands for detection and treatment of oral squamous cancer.Oncotarget · 2019Article
- Repurposed quinacrine synergizes with cisplatin, reducing the effective dose required for treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Oncotarget · 2019Article
- Loss of TP63 Promotes the Metastasis of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Activating MAPK and STAT3 Signaling.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2019Article
- Review
- MAPKAPK2 plays a crucial role in the progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by regulating transcript stability.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019Article
- P-glycoprotein targeted photodynamic therapy of chemoresistant tumors using recombinant Fab fragment conjugates.Biomaterials science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and neck cancers are among the most prevalent tumors in the world. Despite advances in the treatment of head and neck tumors, the survival of patients with these cancers has not markedly improved over the past several decades because of our inability to control and our poor understanding of the regional and distant spread of this disease. One of the factors contributing to our poor understanding may be the lack of reliable animal models of head and neck cancer metastasis. The earliest xenograft models in which human tumor cells were grown in immunosuppressed mice involved subcutaneous implantation of human head and neck cancer cell lines. Subcutaneous xenograft models have been popular because they are easy to establish, easy to manage, and lend themselves to ready quantitation of the tumor burden. More recently, orthotopic xenograft models, in which the tumor cells are implanted in the tumor site of origin, have been used with greater frequency in animal studies of head and neck cancers. Orthotopic xenograft models are advantageous for their ability to mimic local tumor growth and recapitulate the pathways of metastasis seen in human head and neck cancers. In addition, recent innovations in cell labeling techniques and small-animal imaging have enabled investigators to monitor the metastatic process and quantitate the growth and spread of orthopically implanted tumors. This review summarizes the progress in the development of murine xenograft models of head and neck cancers. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each type of xenograft model. We also discuss the potential for these models to help elucidate the mechanisms of regional and distant metastasis, which could improve our ability to treat head and neck cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.