Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19678937›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2009

Integrating microarray analysis and the soybean genome to understand the soybeans iron deficiency response.

Jamie A O'Rourke, Rex T Nelson, David Grant, Jeremy Schmutz, Jane Grimwood, Steven Cannon, Carroll P Vance, Michelle A Graham, Randy C Shoemaker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparing Early Transcriptomic Responses of 18 Soybean (International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Iron deficiency triggered transcriptome changes in bread wheat.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  8. Comprehensive mapping of abiotic stress inputs into the soybean circadian clock.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie A O'RourkeDepartment of Genetics, Developmental and Cellular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA. utehawk@iastate.edu
Rex T Nelson
David Grant
Jeremy Schmutz
Jane Grimwood
Steven Cannon
Carroll P Vance
Michelle A Graham
Randy C Shoemaker
Iowa State University · USJoint Genome Institute · USStanford University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoybeans grown in the upper Midwestern United States often suffer from iron deficiency chlorosis, which results in yield loss at the end of the season. To better understand the effect of iron availability on soybean yield, we identified genes in two near isogenic lines with changes in expression patterns when plants were grown in iron sufficient and iron deficient conditions.

resultsTranscriptional profiles of soybean (Glycine max, L. Merr) near isogenic lines Clark (PI548553, iron efficient) and IsoClark (PI547430, iron inefficient) grown under Fe-sufficient and Fe-limited conditions were analyzed and compared using the Affymetrix GeneChip Soybean Genome Array. There were 835 candidate genes in the Clark (PI548553) genotype and 200 candidate genes in the IsoClark (PI547430) genotype putatively involved in soybean's iron stress response. Of these candidate genes, fifty-eight genes in the Clark genotype were identified with a genetic location within known iron efficiency QTL and 21 in the IsoClark genotype. The arrays also identified 170 single feature polymorphisms (SFPs) specific to either Clark or IsoClark. A sliding window analysis of the microarray data and the 7X genome assembly coupled with an iterative model of the data showed the candidate genes are clustered in the genome. An analysis of 5' untranslated regions in the promoter of candidate genes identified 11 conserved motifs in 248 differentially expressed genes, all from the Clark genotype, representing 129 clusters identified earlier, confirming the cluster analysis results.

conclusionThese analyses have identified the first genes with expression patterns that are affected by iron stress and are located within QTL specific to iron deficiency stress. The genetic location and promoter motif analysis results support the hypothesis that the differentially expressed genes are co-regulated. The combined results of all analyses lead us to postulate iron inefficiency in soybean is a result of a mutation in a transcription factor(s), which controls the expression of genes required in inducing an iron stress response.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantIron DeficienciesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisCluster AnalysisDNA, PlantGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenotypeGlycine maxIronPlant DiseasesPromoter Regions, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociSequence Analysis, DNADNA, PlantIron

Identifiers

PMID19678937
PMCPMC2907705
OpenAlexW2015771354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.