Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19678809›Full record

ArticleAging cell2009

Increasing longevity through caloric restriction or rapamycin feeding in mammals: common mechanisms for common outcomes?

Lynne S Cox, Julie A Mattison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Autophagy in T Cell Function and Aging.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. This old heart: Cardiac aging and autophagy.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A mouse model of diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lynne S CoxDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK. lynne.cox@bioch.ox.ac.uk
Julie A Mattison
National Institute on Aging · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Primate Aging StudiesZ01AG000371 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTISON, JULIE · 2006 to 2008
$1.3M
Primate Aging StudiesZIGAG000371 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI MATTISON, JULIE · 2009 to 2009
$367k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E000924/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E016995/1Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant extension of lifespan in important mammalian species is bound to attract the attention not only of the aging research community, but also the media and the wider public. Two recent papers published by Harrison et al. (2009) in Nature and by Colman et al. (2009) in Science report increased longevity of mice fed with rapamycin and of rhesus monkeys undergoing caloric restriction, respectively. These papers have generated considerable debate in the aging community. Here we assess what is new about these findings, how they fit with our knowledge of lifespan extension from other studies and what prospects this new work holds out for improvements in human longevity and human health span.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaloric RestrictionHumansLife ExpectancyLongevityMacaca mulattaMammalsMiceSirolimusSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID19678809
PMCPMC5144999
OpenAlexW2052414259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.