Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19678756›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2009

Activation and coagulation biomarkers are independent predictors of the development of opportunistic disease in patients with HIV infection.

Alison J Rodger, Zoe Fox, Jens D Lundgren, Lewis H Kuller, Christoph Boesecke, Daniela Gey, Athanassios Skoutelis, Matthew Bidwell Goetz, Andrew N Phillips, INSIGHT Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alison J RodgerHIV Epidemiology and Biostatistics Group, Research Dept. of Infection and Population Health, UCL Medical School, University College London, London, UK. a.rodger@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Zoe Fox
Jens D Lundgren
Lewis H Kuller
Christoph Boesecke
Daniela Gey
Athanassios Skoutelis
Matthew Bidwell Goetz
Andrew N Phillips
INSIGHT Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group

Funding

COMMUNITY PROGRAMS FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH ON AIDSU01AI046362 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI GORDIN, FRED M · 2000 to 2006
$75.9M
TERRY BEIRN COMMUNITY PROGRAMS FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH ONU01AI042170 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI NEATON, JAMES DENNIS · 1997 to 2006
$23.2M
Medical Research Council MC_U122886352NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI 042170NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI042170NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI046362NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI 46362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActivation and coagulation biomarkers were measured within the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) trial. Their associations with opportunistic disease (OD) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients were examined.

methodsInflammatory (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP], interleukin-6 [IL-6], amyloid-A, and amyloid-P) and coagulation (D-dimer and prothrombin-fragment 1+2) markers were determined. Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between these biomarkers and risk of OD.

resultsThe 91 patients who developed an OD were matched to 182 control subjects. Patients with an hsCRP level > or =5 microg/mL at baseline had a 3.5 higher odds of OD (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-8.1) than did those with an hsCRP level <1 microg/mL (P=.003, by test for trend) and patients with an IL-6 level > or =3 pg/mL at baseline had a 2.4 higher odds of OD (95% CI, 1.0-5.4) than did those with an IL-6 level <1.5 pg/mL (P=.02, by test for trend). No other baseline biomarkers predicted development of an OD. Latest follow-up hsCRP level for those with an hsCRP level > or =5 microg/mL (compared with a level <1 microg/mL; odds ratio [OR], 7.6; 95% CI, 2.0-28.5; [P=.002, by test for trend), latest amyloid-A level for those with an amyloid-A level > or =6 mg/L (compared with a level <2 mg/L; OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.1-13.4; P=.03, by test for trend), and latest IL-6 level for those with an IL-6 level > or =3 pg/mL (compared with a level <1.5 pg/mL; OR 2.4; 95% CI, 0.7-8.8; P=.04, by test for trend) were also associated with development of an OD.

conclusionsHigher IL-6 and hsCRP levels independently predicted development of OD. These biomarkers could provide additional prognostic information for predicting the risk of OD.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsAnti-HIV AgentsBlood CoagulationCase-Control StudiesC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansInflammationInterleukin-6MaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRisk FactorsSerum Amyloid A ProteinAnti-HIV AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinInterleukin-6Serum Amyloid A ProteinSerum Amyloid P-Component

Identifiers

PMID19678756
PMCPMC2892757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.