Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19678714›Full record

ReviewDrugs2009

Estradiol valerate/dienogest: in oral contraception.

Sheridan M Hoy, Lesley J Scott

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheridan M HoyWolters Kluwer Health/Adis, 41 Centorian Drive, Mairangi Bay, North Shore 0754, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Lesley J Scott
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZWolters Kluwer Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estradiol valerate/dienogest is an oral contraceptive for women that combines the natural estrogen estradiol with the 19-nortestosterone derivative dienogest in a four-phasic formulation. Estradiol valerate/dienogest demonstrated contraceptive efficacy in a large (n = 1377), noncomparative, multicentre study in women aged 18-50 years, with 13 pregnancies over 1797.5 women-years of exposure generating an unadjusted Pearl Index (PI) of 0.73 (upper limit of 95% CI 1.24) [primary endpoint]. Six of the pregnancies were attributed to method failure, resulting in an adjusted PI, based on 1786.5 women-years of exposure, of 0.34 (upper limit of 95% CI 0.73). In a double-blind study in 798 women aged 18-50 years, estradiol valerate/dienogest and ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel demonstrated an acceptable bleeding pattern and level of cycle control, according to several co-primary endpoints. As reported in the UK manufacturer's summary of product characteristics, the unadjusted PI for women aged 18-35 years or 18-50 years in a pooled analysis of clinical studies was 1.01 (upper limit of 95% CI 1.59) and 0.79 (upper limit of 95% CI 1.23). This pooled analysis of three studies excluded those pregnancies occurring within 14 days of the cessation of therapy. Estradiol valerate/dienogest was generally well tolerated in this population, with the nature of adverse events generally similar across the studies and between estradiol valerate/dienogest and ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, OralAdolescentAdultChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug CombinationsEstradiolFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNandrolonePregnancyYoung AdultContraceptives, OraldienogestDrug CombinationsEstradiolNandrolone

Identifiers

PMID19678714
OpenAlexW2014431071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.