Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19676054›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2010

Udp-glucose dehydrogenase as a novel field-specific candidate biomarker of prostate cancer.

Dali Huang, George P Casale, Jun Tian, Subodh M Lele, Vladimir M Pisarev, Melanie A Simpson, George P Hemstreet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Integration of Sugar Metabolism and Proteoglycan Synthesis by UDP-glucose Dehydrogenase.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2021
    Review
  11. Regulation of cancer stem cells in triple negative breast cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dali HuangDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
George P Casale
Jun Tian
Subodh M Lele
Vladimir M Pisarev
Melanie A Simpson
George P Hemstreet
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

UNMC/EPPLEY CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA036727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Apar Kishor Ganti · 1985 to 2026
$55.0M
Role of hyaluronan matrix in prostate cancer progressionR01CA106584 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI SIMPSON, MELANIE A. · 2005 to 2010
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA036727NCI NIH HHS P30 CA36727NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucose dehydrogenase (UGDH) catalyzes the oxidation of UDP-glucose to yield UDP-glucuronic acid, a precursor for synthesis of glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans that promote aggressive prostate cancer (PC) progression. The purpose of our study was to determine if the UGDH expression in normal appearing acini (NAA) from cancerous glands is a candidate biomarker for PC field disease/effect assayed by quantitative fluorescence imaging analysis (QFIA). A polyclonal antibody to UGDH was titrated to saturation binding and fluorescent microscopic images acquired from fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue slices were quantitatively analyzed. Specificity of the assay was confirmed by Western blot analysis and competitive inhibition of tissue labeling with the recombinant UGDH. Reproducibility of the UGDH measurements was high within and across analytical runs. Quantification of UGDH by QFIA and Reverse-Phase Protein Array analysis were strongly correlated (r = 0.97), validating the QFIA measurements. Analysis of cancerous acini (CA) and NAA from PC patients vs. normal acini (NA) from noncancerous controls (32 matched pairs) revealed significant (p < 0.01) differences, with CA (increased) vs. NA, NAA (decreased) vs. NA and CA (increased) vs. NAA. Areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were 0.68 (95% CI: 0.59-0.83) for NAA and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.83) for CA (both vs. NA). These results support the UGDH content in prostatic acini as a novel candidate biomarker that may complement the development of a multi-biomarker panel for detecting PC within the tumor adjacent field on a histologically normal biopsy specimen.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyBlotting, WesternCell Line, TumorHumansMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceMiddle AgedProstateProstatic NeoplasmsProtein Array AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificityUridine Diphosphate Glucose DehydrogenaseBiomarkers, TumorUridine Diphosphate Glucose Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID19676054
PMCPMC2794918
OpenAlexW2038111996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.