Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19675579›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2010

Regeneration of multilineage skin epithelia by differentiated keratinocytes.

Jaana Mannik, Kamil Alzayady, Soosan Ghazizadeh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Myc-dependent dedifferentiation of Gata6Nature cell biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ovary and fimbrial stem cells: biology, niche and cancer origins.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2015
    Review
  16. Palatogenesis and cutaneous repair: A two-headed coin.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaana MannikDepartment of Oral Biology and Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8702, USA.
Kamil Alzayady
Soosan Ghazizadeh
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

Host Immune Responses in Cutaneous Gene TherapyR01AR050525 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI GHAZIZADEH, SOOSAN · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
Skin regeneration by terminally differentiated keratinocytesR21AR056013 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI GHAZIZADEH, SOOSAN · 2008 to 2009
$372k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR050525NIAMS NIH HHS AR056013NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050525NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR056013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although homeostasis of rapidly renewing tissues like skin epithelia is maintained by stem cells, the committed progeny of stem cells in the basal layer of epidermis retain regenerative potential and are capable of forming epidermis in response to environmental cues. It is not clear, however, at what point within the epidermal lineage keratinocytes lose this regenerative potential. In this study, we examined the extent of tissue formation by post-mitotic differentiated keratinocytes. We show that cultures of mouse keratinocytes that were, by all measures, differentiated were able to reform a self-renewing, hair-bearing skin when transplanted onto suitable sites in vivo. Genetic labeling and lineage-tracing studies in combination with an involucrin-driven Cre/lox reporter system confirmed that transplanted differentiated keratinocytes were indeed the source of the regenerated skin. More importantly, analysis of early stages of skin regeneration showed hallmarks of dedifferentiation of transplanted differentiated keratinocytes. These data indicate that commitment to differentiation does not prohibit cells from re-entering the cell cycle, de-differentiating, and acquiring "stemness". These findings suggest that epidermis can use different strategies for homeostasis and tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

RegenerationSkin Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageEpidermal CellsEpitheliumGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsKeratinocytesMiceMice, NudeMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastModels, GeneticGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19675579
PMCPMC2879264
OpenAlexW1991203219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.