ArticleBMC genomics2009
Application of massive parallel sequencing to whole genome SNP discovery in the porcine genome.
Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A causal SNP in the promoter ofZoological research · 2026Article
- Analysis of genome-wide SNPs based on 2b-RAD sequencing of pooled samples reveals signature of selection in different populations ofJournal of biosciences · 2019Article
- Zika Virus Causes Persistent Infection in Porcine Conceptuses and may Impair Health in Offspring.EBioMedicine · 2017Article
- Genome-Wide SNP Discovery and Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Farmed Sika Deer (G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Recombination of the porcine X chromosome: a high density linkage map.BMC genetics · 2014Article
- Genome sequencing and analysis of Mangalica, a fatty local pig of Hungary.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Mutation discovery for Mendelian traits in non-laboratory animals: a review of achievements up to 2012.Animal genetics · 2014Review
- Generation of SNP datasets for orangutan population genomics using improved reduced-representation sequencing and direct comparisons of SNP calling algorithms.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Dissecting structural and nucleotide genome-wide variation in inbred Iberian pigs.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Article
- Sequencing technologies and genome sequencing.Journal of applied genetics · 2011Review
- Partial short-read sequencing of a highly inbred Iberian pig and genomics inference thereof.Heredity · 2011Article
- Single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery by high-throughput sequencing in sorghum.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2011Review
- Genome-wide footprints of pig domestication and selection revealed through massive parallel sequencing of pooled DNA.PloS one · 2011Article
- Genome wide SNP discovery, analysis and evaluation in mallard (Anas platyrhynchos).BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Calling SNPs without a reference sequence.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Article
- Estimating the population mutation rate from a de novo assembled Bactrian camel genome and cross-species comparison with dromedary ESTs.The Journal of heredityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the Illumina 1 G Genome Analyzer generates billions of base pairs of sequence data, challenges arise in sequence selection due to the varying sequence quality. Therefore, in the framework of the International Porcine SNP Chip Consortium, this pilot study aimed to evaluate the impact of the quality level of the sequenced bases on mapping quality and identification of true SNPs on a large scale.
resultsDNA pooled from five animals from a commercial boar line was digested with DraI; 150-250-bp fragments were isolated and end-sequenced using the Illumina 1 G Genome Analyzer, yielding 70,348,064 sequences 36-bp long. Rules were developed to select sequences, which were then aligned to unique positions in a reference genome. Sequences were selected based on quality, and three thresholds of sequence quality (SQ) were compared. The highest threshold of SQ allowed identification of a larger number of SNPs (17,489), distributed widely across the pig genome. In total, 3,142 SNPs were validated with a success rate of 96%. The correlation between estimated minor allele frequency (MAF) and genotyped MAF was moderate, and SNPs were highly polymorphic in other pig breeds. Lowering the SQ threshold and maintaining the same criteria for SNP identification resulted in the discovery of fewer SNPs (16,768), of which 259 were not identified using higher SQ levels. Validation of SNPs found exclusively in the lower SQ threshold had a success rate of 94% and a low correlation between estimated MAF and genotyped MAF. Base change analysis suggested that the rate of transitions in the pig genome is likely to be similar to that observed in humans. Chromosome X showed reduced nucleotide diversity relative to autosomes, as observed for other species.
conclusionLarge numbers of SNPs can be identified reliably by creating strict rules for sequence selection, which simultaneously decreases sequence ambiguity. Selection of sequences using a higher SQ threshold leads to more reliable identification of SNPs. Lower SQ thresholds can be used to guarantee sufficient sequence coverage, resulting in high success rate but less reliable MAF estimation. Nucleotide diversity varies between porcine chromosomes, with the X chromosome showing less variation as observed in other species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.