Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19674445›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2009

Prioritising neonatal medicines research: UK Medicines for Children Research Network scoping survey.

Mark A Turner, Sara Lewis, Daniel B Hawcutt, D Field

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review of Drug Utilization Studies in Neonatal Units: A Global Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Cross-sectional study of drug utilisation in a Chinese neonatal unit.The Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Aminoglycoside-induced nephrotoxicity in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Adverse Drug Reactions in Children: Pediatric Pharmacy and Drug Safety.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A TurnerDivision of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. mark.turner@liverpool.ac.uk
Sara Lewis
Daniel B Hawcutt
D Field
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dosing regimen and indications for many medicines in current use in neonatology are not well defined. There is a need to prioritise research in this area, but currently there is little information about which drugs are used in UK neonatal units and the research needs in this area as perceived by UK neonatologists.

methodsThe Neonatal Clinical Studies Group (CSG) of the Medicines for Children Research Network (MCRN) undertook a 2 week prospective scoping survey study to establish which medicines are used in UK neonatal units; how many babies are receiving them; and what clinicians (and other health professionals) believe are important issues for future research.

results49 out of 116 units responded to at least one element of the survey (42%). 37 units reported the number of neonates who received medicines over a 2 week period. A total of 3924 medicine-patient pairs were reported with 119 different medicines. 70% of medicine-patient pairs involved medicines that were missing either a license or dose for either term or preterm neonates. 4.3% of medicine-patient pairs involved medicines that were missing both license and dose for any neonate. The most common therapeutic gap in need of additional research identified by UK neonatologists was chronic lung disease (21 responding units), followed by patent ductus arteriosus and vitamin supplements (11 responding units for both)

conclusionThe research agenda for neonatal medicines can be informed by knowledge of current medicine use and the collective views of the neonatal community.

Indexed as

Nurseries, HospitalData CollectionDrug UtilizationHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID19674445
PMCPMC2734345
OpenAlexW2111436800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.