Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19673539›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics

Computational models for drug inhibition of the human apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter.

Xiaowan Zheng, Sean Ekins, Jean-Pierre Raufman, James E Polli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Machine Learning Models forMolecular pharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  3. Risk Factors of Patients With Diarrhea for HavingFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Bile acid transporter-mediated oral drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Repurposing Approved Drugs as Inhibitors of KPharmaceutical research · 2019
    Article
  12. AMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaowan ZhengDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, 20 Penn Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
Sean Ekins
Jean-Pierre Raufman
James E Polli
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and InnovationU01FD005946 · FDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BENTLEY, WILLIAM E., POLLI, JAMES E · 2016 to 2025
$21.5M
Substrate requirements of the bile acid transporterR01DK067530 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI POLLI, JAMES E · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
FDA HHS U01 FD005946NIDDK NIH HHS DK67530NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT; SLC10A2) is the primary mechanism for intestinal bile acid reabsorption. In the colon, secondary bile acids increase the risk of cancer. Therefore, drugs that inhibit ASBT have the potential to increase the risk of colon cancer. The objectives of this study were to identify FDA-approved drugs that inhibit ASBT and to derive computational models for ASBT inhibition. Inhibition was evaluated using ASBT-MDCK monolayers and taurocholate as the model substrate. Computational modeling employed a HipHop qualitative approach, a Hypogen quantitative approach, and a modified Laplacian Bayesian modeling method using 2D descriptors. Initially, 30 compounds were screened for ASBT inhibition. A qualitative pharmacophore was developed using the most potent 11 compounds and applied to search a drug database, yielding 58 hits. Additional compounds were tested, and their K(i) values were measured. A 3D-QSAR and a Bayesian model were developed using 38 molecules. The quantitative pharmacophore consisted of one hydrogen bond acceptor, three hydrophobic features, and five excluded volumes. Each model was further validated with two external test sets of 30 and 19 molecules. Validation analysis showed both models exhibited good predictability in determining whether a drug is a potent or nonpotent ASBT inhibitor. The Bayesian model correctly ranked the most active compounds. In summary, using a combined in vitro and computational approach, we found that many FDA-approved drugs from diverse classes, such as the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and HMG CoA-reductase inhibitors, are ASBT inhibitors.

Indexed as

AnimalsArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremBile Acids and SaltsCalcium Channel BlockersCell LineColonic NeoplasmsDiureticsDogsDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIntestinal AbsorptionIn Vitro TechniquesModels, BiologicalBile Acids and SaltsCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsOrganic Anion Transporters, Sodium-DependentRecombinant Proteinssodium-bile acid cotransporterSymporters

Identifiers

PMID19673539
PMCPMC2757534
OpenAlexW2007705439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.