ArticleRheumatology international2010
A comparison of performance of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide 2 and citrullinated protein antibodies in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in Iranian patients.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody combined with rheumatoid factor in rheumatoid arthritis in Asia: a meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Pooled it
- Discriminative and diagnostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in Iranian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology international · 2013Article
- Feasibility study of semi-automated measurements of finger joint space widths.Rheumatology international · 2011Article
- The diagnostic utility of the anti-CCP antibody test is no better than rheumatoid factor in South Africans with early rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibodies to citrullinated proteins and rheumatoid factor (RF) are widely used in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the antibodies to citrullinated proteins appear to be the most specific markers of the disease. The objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of the anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide 2 (anti-CCP2) and citrullinated protein Antibodies (CPA) with RF in the diagnosis of RA. Serum samples of 139 patients with RA and 131 patients with other rheumatic diseases were checked for anti-CCP2, CPA uses citrullinated recombinant rat filaggrin as the antigen assay, and RF. The specificity, sensitivity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of tests were then compared. The sensitivity of anti-CCP2, CPA, and RF were 82.7, 83.5, and 61.5%, respectively. The specificities of the tests were 91.2, 78.6, and 90.5%, respectively. The area under ROC curves for the tests were 0.925, 0.890, and 0.847, respectively. Exclusion of overlaps was associated with improved specificity for CPA but no change in the specificity of RF and anti-CCP. The sensitivity of anti-CCP2, CPA, and RF were 66.7, 77.8, and 51.9% for patients with early RA, respectively. The findings of the present study indicate that anti-CCP2 might be of a better diagnostic value for the diagnosis of RA. They also showed that CPA and in the second place anti-CCP2 were useful in the diagnosis of early RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.