ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2010
Humanized birth in high risk pregnancy: barriers and facilitating factors.
Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Providing individualised care to high-risk women in the intrapartum period - an interpretive descriptive study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Reclaiming Agency Through Birth: Birth Mode, Postpartum Mental Health, and Ethical Responsibilities in High-Risk Pregnancies.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- The depth structure of a good birth: reconfiguring the environment in a high-risk labour ward birth and creating sanctuary behind a screen.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Is There a Place for Family-centered Cesarean Delivery during Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment?Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Article
- Operationalizing respectful maternity care at the healthcare provider level: a systematic scoping review.Reproductive health · 2021Article
- Exploring women's experiences of participation in shared decision-making during childbirth: a qualitative study at a reference hospital in Spain.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- COVID-19 Pandemic and Birth Experience. The Monopoly of Caesarean Sections. A Critical Realist Review.Maedica · 2021Article
- Quality of intrapartum care at health centers in Jabi Tehinan district, North West Ethiopia: clients' perspective.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Respectful midwifery care during the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of midwifery · 2020Article
- Status of respectful and non-abusive care during facility-based childbirth in a hospital and health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Reproductive health · 2015Article
- "We have been working overnight without sleeping": traditional birth attendants' practices and perceptions of post-partum care services in rural Tanzania.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Article
- Comparison of childbirth care models in public hospitals, Brazil.Revista de saude publica · 2014Article
- Understanding childbirth practices as an organizational cultural phenomenon: a conceptual framework.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2013Review
- Maternity care providers' perceptions of women's autonomy and the law.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2013Article
- Nurses' perspectives on the intersection of safety and informed decision making in maternity care.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNNArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The medical model of childbearing assumes that a pregnancy always has the potential to turn into a risky procedure. In order to advocate humanized birth in high risk pregnancy, an important step involves the enlightenment of the professional's preconceptions on humanized birth in such a situation. The goal of this paper is to identify the professionals' perception of the potential obstacles and facilitating factors for the implementation of humanized care in high risk pregnancies. Twenty-one midwives, obstetricians, and health administrator professionals from the clinical and academic fields were interviewed in nine different sites in Japan from June through August 2008. The interviews were audio taped, and transcribed with the participants' consent. Data was subsequently analyzed using content analysis qualitative methods. Professionals concurred with the concept that humanized birth is a changing and promising process, and can often bring normality to the midst of a high obstetric risk situation. No practice guidelines can be theoretically defined for humanized birth in a high risk pregnancy, as there is no conflict between humanized birth and medical intervention in such a situation. Barriers encountered in providing humanized birth in a high risk pregnancy include factors such as: the pressure of being responsible for the safety of the mother and the fetus, lack of the women's active involvement in the decision making process and the heavy burden of responsibility on the physician's shoulders, potential legal issues, and finally, the lack of midwifery authority in providing care at high risk pregnancy. The factors that facilitate humanized birth in a high risk include: the sharing of decision making and other various responsibilities between the physicians and the women; being caring; stress management, and the fact that the evolution of a better relationship and communication between the health professional and the patient will lead to a stress-free environment for both. Humanized birth in a high risk pregnancy is something that goes beyond just curing women of their illnesses. It can be considered as a token of caring, and continued support, which positively consolidates the doctor-patient relationship. As yet, it has not been described as a practiced guideline, due to its ever-changing complexities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.