ReviewDer Anaesthesist2009
[Concepts for perioperative pain therapy. A critical stocktaking].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Pediatric perioperative systemic pain therapy: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations on pediatric perioperative pain management].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2014Guideline
- [Anesthesia for medical students : A brief guide to practical anesthesia in adults with a web-based video illustration].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Review
- [Perioperative pain management: what is evidence based?].Der Orthopade · 2014Article
- [Perioperative pain management for abdominal and thoracic surgery].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2014Review
- [Quality of postoperative pain therapy: evaluation of an established anesthesiology acute pain service].Der Anaesthesist · 2013Article
- [Future-oriented design of ambulatory surgery. Organizational aspects and medical options].Der Anaesthesist · 2011Review
- [Quality of postoperative pain therapy in Austria: national survey of all departments of anesthesiology].Der Anaesthesist · 2011Article
- Implementation of a standardized pain management in a pediatric surgery unit.Pediatric surgery international · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite numerous publications, new guidelines for the treatment of acute pain and efforts from a number of initiatives, there is still a tremendous need for improvement in postoperative pain therapy. One of the reasons for the shortcomings in the care of patients with postoperative pain is the lack of applicability of guidelines in daily clinical practice. Therefore, simple but effective and easy to implement concepts need to be developed. In the following review, different concepts that have been developed over recent years are presented and evaluated for their effectiveness. One of these is the notion of balanced analgesia, currently probably one of the most widely used perioperative therapy concepts. The idea of this concept is to reduce the doses of analgesics, e.g. opioids, through combinations of different classes of analgesics, thereby reducing their side effects. However, recent studies and essential meta-analyses indicate pitfalls using this concept. The pros and cons will be discussed and ideas on how to deal with balanced analgesia in daily practice will be given. Another pain concept of "procedure-specific postoperative pain therapy", is an appealing idea of an international initiative from surgeons and anaesthesiologists and an essential part of the German S3 guidelines for acute pain released last year. Critical evaluation of the available recommendations for procedure-specific analgesia together with the presentation of relatively simple but evidence-based algorithms for specific procedures may help to implement this concept in clinical routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19669705What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.