Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19669387›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2009

Animal models of human cerebellar ataxias: a cornerstone for the therapies of the twenty-first century.

Mario Manto, Daniele Marmolino

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Intracerebellar application of P19-derived neuroprogenitor and naive stem cells to Lurcher mutant and wild type B6CBA mice.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mario MantoFNRS-Laboratoire de Neurologie Expérimentale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, ULB-Erasme, 1070 Brussels, Belgium. mmanto@ulb.ac.be
Daniele Marmolino
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar ataxias represent a group of disabling neurological disorders. Our understanding of the pathogenesis of cerebellar ataxias is continuously expanding. A considerable number of laboratory animals with neurological mutations have been reported and numerous relevant animal models mimicking the phenotype of cerebellar ataxias are becoming available. These models greatly help dissecting the numerous mechanisms of cerebellar dysfunction, a major step for the assessment of therapeutics targeting a given deleterious pathway and for the screening of old or newly synthesized chemical compounds. Nevertheless, differences between animal models and human disorders should not be overlooked and difficulties in terms of characterization should not be occulted. The identification of the mutations of many hereditary ataxias, the development of valuable animal models, and the recent identifications of the molecular mechanisms underlying cerebellar disorders represent a combination of key factors for the development of anti-ataxic innovative therapies. It is anticipated that the twenty-first century will be the century of effective therapies in the field of cerebellar ataxias. The animal models are a cornerstone to reach this goal.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCerebellar AtaxiaHumans

Identifiers

PMID19669387
OpenAlexW2034608959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.