Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19669109›Full record

ArticleLung

Extended nitric oxide measurements in exhaled air of cystic fibrosis and healthy adults.

Markus Hofer, Luzia Mueller, Thomas Rechsteiner, Christian Benden, Annette Boehler

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lung. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of exhaled nitric oxide in acute paraquat poisoning: a pilot study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markus HoferDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistr 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luzia Mueller
Thomas Rechsteiner
Christian Benden
Annette Boehler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is not raised, but rather is normal or even decreased when measured at a single expiratory flow. FeNO measurements at several flow rates allow differentiation between alveolar and bronchial nitric oxide (NO) production. Extended FeNO measurements therefore should be useful to localize the FeNO deficit in CF airways. FeNO was measured in stable CF adults with moderate lung disease and in healthy controls. Bronchial NO fluxes (J(NO,Br)) and alveolar NO concentrations (C(Alv)) were calculated from FeNO measurements at flow rates of 100, 150 and 200 ml/s using a method previously described. Thirty-two adults were included in the study, 12 of whom had CF. CF adults had significantly lower FeNO values at all flow rates. The median J(NO,Br) was significantly lower in CF adults than in healthy controls [0.31 nl/s (range = 0.11-0.63) vs. 0.70 nl/s (0.27-3.52); P < 0.001], while the median C(Alv) was similar in both groups [1.7 ppb (0.3-3.9) vs. 1.2 (0.1-5.2)]. Pulmonary NO exchange did not differ significantly between subgroups of CF patients with and without chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. No significant correlation was detectable between FEV(1)/VC and J(NO,Br) and C(Alv), respectively. Extended FeNO measurements can separate alveolar and bronchial NO outputs in CF adults. The lower FeNO in adults with moderate to severe CF lung disease is likely to be the result of lower bronchial NO output.

Indexed as

Breath TestsExhalationAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchiCase-Control StudiesCystic FibrosisDeoxyribonuclease IExpectorantsFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalNitric OxideAnti-Bacterial AgentsDeoxyribonuclease IDNASE1 protein, humanExpectorantsNitric Oxide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.