ReviewLung2010
Cough due to asthma and nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis.
Review in Lung, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- WAO-ARIA consensus on chronic cough - Part 1: Role of TRP channels in neurogenic inflammation of cough neuronal pathways.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2021Review
- Non-astmatic Eosinophilic Bronchitis.Turkish thoracic journal · 2018Review
- Metalworking fluids: a new cause of occupational non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis.Thorax · 2017Article
- Cough hypersensitivity as a neuro-immune interaction.Clinical and translational allergy · 2015Review
- Antitussive drugs--past, present, and future.Pharmacological reviews · 2014Review
- Article
- Role of PGE2 in asthma and nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis.Mediators of inflammation · 2012Review
- Cough: an unmet clinical need.British journal of pharmacology · 2011Review
- Chronic inflammation and asthma.Mutation research · 2010Review
- Value of ambroxol in the treatment of asthmatic bronchitis.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Asthma and nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis are among the most common causes of chronic cough, accounting for about 25 and 10% of cases, respectively. Chronic cough due to asthma may present in isolation in which case it is known as cough-variant asthma. Nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis is characterized by the presence of eosinophilic airway inflammation in the absence of variable airflow obstruction or airway hyperresponsiveness. Both conditions share many immunopathological features with the exceptions to date of mast cell infiltration into the airway smooth muscle, increased IL-13 expression, and narrowing and thickening of the airway wall, which are features reserved to asthma. In most cases the trigger that causes the cough is uncertain. However, removal of potential triggers is important to consider, in particular with respect to occupational exposure to known sensitisers. In both conditions there is subjective and objective improvement following treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, which is associated with the presence of an airway eosinophilia. Whether eosinophilic inflammation is the cause of cough or an epiphenomenon is uncertain, but the failure of anti-IL-5 to modify cough in asthma has questioned a causal association. In asthma, beta-agonist theophylline, leukotriene receptor antagonist, and oral corticosteroid therapy improve cough. In noneosinophilic bronchitis, some patients require oral corticosteroids but the benefit of other additional therapies is unknown. In general, response to therapy in both conditions is very good and the limited long-term data available suggest that both usually have a benign course, although in some cases persistent airflow obstruction may occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.