Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19667971›Full record

ArticleBehavioural pharmacology2009

Quantitative analysis of the effect of lesions of the subthalamic nucleus on intertemporal choice: further evidence for enhancement of the incentive value of food reinforcers.

G Bezzina, T H C Cheung, S Body, J F W Deakin, I M Anderson, Chris M Bradshaw, E Szabadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G BezzinaPsychopharmacology Section, Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
T H C Cheung
S Body
J F W Deakin
I M Anderson
Chris M Bradshaw
E Szabadi

Funding

Wellcome Trust 077727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is involved in regulating the incentive value of food reinforcers. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of lesions of the STN on intertemporal choice (choice between reinforcers differing in size and delay). Rats with bilateral quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the STN (n = 15) or sham lesions (n = 14) were trained in a discrete-trials progressive delay schedule to press levers A and B for a sucrose solution. Responses on A delivered 50 microl of the solution after a delay d(A); responses on B delivered 100 microl after a delay d(B). d(B) increased across blocks of trials; d(A) was manipulated across phases of the experiment. Indifference delay, d(B(50)) (value of d(B) corresponding to 50% choice of B), was estimated for each rat in each phase, and linear indifference functions (d(B(50)) vs. d(A)) were derived. The STN-lesioned group showed a flatter slope of the indifference function (implying higher instantaneous reinforcer values) than the sham-lesioned group; the intercepts did not differ between the groups. The results agree with recent evidence for a role of the STN in incentive value. Unlike some earlier studies, these results do not indicate a role of the STN in delay discounting.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantFemaleFood PreferencesMotivationPsychomotor PerformanceRatsRats, WistarReinforcement ScheduleSubthalamic NucleusTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID19667971
PMCPMC2923070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.