Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19666040›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2009

Taste perception of monosodium glutamate and inosine monophosphate by 129P3/J and C57BL/6ByJ mice.

Yuko Murata, Gary K Beauchamp, Alexander A Bachmanov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmacology of the Umami Taste Receptor.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  3. Variation in the geneAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Flavor Preferences Conditioned by Dietary Glutamate.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016
    Review
  9. Genetics of Amino Acid Taste and Appetite.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetics of taste receptors.Current pharmaceutical design · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuko MurataMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-3308, USA. betty@affrc.go.jp
Gary K Beauchamp
Alexander A Bachmanov
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USJapan Fisheries Research and Education Agency · JP

Funding

MODIFICATION OF SALT TASTER01DC000882 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI BACHMANOV, ALEXANDER A · 1990 to 2013
$4.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC00882NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous studies have shown that in long-term two-bottle preference tests, mice from the C57BL/6ByJ (B6) inbred strain drink more monosodium glutamate (MSG) and inosine monophosphate (IMP) than mice from the 129P3/J (129) inbred strain. The goal of this study was to examine whether this variation in consumption could be attributed to strain differences in perception of the taste quality of MSG and IMP. We developed a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in B6 and 129 mice to 100 mM MSG or 10 mM IMP and used a brief-access taste assay to examine CTA generalization. B6 and 129 mice did not differ in the generalization patterns following CTA to MSG: mice from both strains generalized CTA from MSG to NaCl. In contrast, strain differences in the generalization patterns were evident following the CTA to IMP: while mice from both strains generalized CTA from IMP to MSG, 129 mice tended to have stronger CTA generalization to saccharin and d-tryptophan, both of which are perceived as sweet by humans. These data suggest that the strain differences in MSG consumption are not due to variation in perception of the taste quality of MSG. Instead, the differential intake of IMP likely reflects strain differences in the way the taste quality of IMP is perceived. Our data suggest that mice perceive MSG and IMP as complex taste stimuli: some taste components are shared between these two substances, but their relative intensity seems to be different for MSG and IMP. The amiloride-sensitive salt taste component is more prevalent in MSG than in IMP taste, and in B6 compared with 129 mice.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAvoidance LearningConditioning, OperantDose-Response Relationship, DrugFeeding BehaviorFood AdditivesFood PreferencesGeneralization, PsychologicalInosine MonophosphateMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSodium GlutamateTasteTaste PerceptionTaste ThresholdFood AdditivesInosine MonophosphateSodium Glutamate

Identifiers

PMID19666040
PMCPMC2770067
OpenAlexW2027478385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.