Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19665611›Full record

ReviewRespiratory physiology & neurobiology2009

Transplantation-mediated strategies to promote axonal regeneration following spinal cord injury.

Xiao-Ming Xu, Stephen M Onifer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory physiology & neurobiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neuroprotective effects of P7C3 against spinal cord injury in rats.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Effects of Olig2-overexpressing neural stem cells and myelin basic protein-activated T cells on recovery from spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2012
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Ming XuSpinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Group, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States. xu26@iupui.edu
Stephen M Onifer
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

UK Spinal Cord &Brain Injury Research Center Core GrantP30NS051220 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HALL, EDWARD D. · 2005 to 2015
$6.4M
Reprogramming reactive glial cells into functional new neurons after SCIR01NS111776 · NINDS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WU, WEI, ZHANG, CHUN-LI · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
SCHWANN CELLS, NEUROTROPHINS AND SPINAL CORD REGROWTHR01NS036350 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI XU, XIAO-MING · 1998 to 2006
$1.9M
PKC inhibition-mediated spinal cord regenerationR01NS052290 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI XU, XIAO-MING · 2005 to 2009
$1.8M
Tissue engineering in spinal cord regenerationR01NS050243 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WEN, XUEJUN · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS 1P30 NS051220NINDS NIH HHS NS36350NINDS NIH HHS NS50243NINDS NIH HHS NS52290NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS051220NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036350NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050243NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052290NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Devastating central nervous system injuries and diseases continue to occur in spite of the tremendous efforts of various prevention programs. The enormity and annual escalation of healthcare costs due to them require that therapeutic strategies be responsibly developed. The dysfunctions that occur after injury and disease are primarily due to neurotransmission damage. The last two decades of both experimental and clinical research have demonstrated that neural and non-neural tissue and cell transplantation is a viable option for ameliorating dysfunctions to markedly improve quality of life. Moreover, significant progress has been made with tissue and cell transplantation in studies of pathophysiology, plasticity, sprouting, regeneration, and functional recovery. This article will review information about the ability and potential, particularly for traumatic spinal cord injury, that neural and non-neural tissue and cell transplantation has to replace lost neurons and glia, to reconstruct damaged neural circuitry, and to restore neurotransmitters, hormones, neurotrophic factors, and neurotransmission. Donor tissues and cells to be discussed include peripheral nerve, fetal spinal cord and brain, central and peripheral nervous systems' glia, stem cells, those that have been genetically engineered, and non-neural ones. Combinatorial approaches and clinical research are also reviewed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsCell TransplantationHumansNerve RegenerationNerve Tissue ProteinsRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesTissue TransplantationNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19665611
PMCPMC2800078
OpenAlexW1999457633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.