Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19664194›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2009

Amphetamine recapitulates developmental programs in the zebrafish.

Jean Lud Cadet

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCommentReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean Lud CadetMolecular Neuropsychiatry Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse/IRP, NIH Biomedical Research Center, 251 Bayview Blvd, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. jcadet@intra.nida.nih.gov
National Institute on Drug Abuse · US

Funding

Neurotoxicity in the adult rat following chronic exposure to methamphetamineZIADA000552 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI CADET, JEAN LUD · 2009 to 2025
$34.3M
Protective effects of DA antagonists Vs METH induced toxicity in ratsZIADA000551 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI CADET, JEAN LUD · 2009 to 2016
$4.7M
Methamphetamine Administration Causes Death of Dopaminergic Neurons in the MouseZ01DA000494 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI CADET, JEAN LUD · 2007 to 2008
$1.1M
Methamphetamine Administration Causes Death of Dopaminergic Neurons in the MouseZIADA000494 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI CADET, JEAN LUD · 2009 to 2011
$1.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addictive drugs hijack the human brain's 'reward' systems. A zebrafish model of addiction has recently been used to query changes in gene expression during this process.

Indexed as

AmphetamineAnimalsBehavior, AddictiveCentral Nervous System StimulantsConditioning, ClassicalModels, BiologicalRewardSignal TransductionTranscription, GeneticZebrafishAmphetamineCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID19664194
PMCPMC2728523
OpenAlexW2096021722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.