Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19663716›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2009

HIV testing and conspiracy beliefs regarding the origins of HIV among African Americans.

Amy S B Bohnert, Carl A Latkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy S B BohnertVA National Serious Mental Illness Treatment Research Evaluation Center, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA. amybohne@med.umich.edu
Carl A Latkin
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

A Network & Dyad HIV Prevention Intervention for Intravenous Drug UserR01DA016555 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATKIN, CARL A · 2003 to 2007
$3.3M
The Impact of Neighborhoods, Networks and Depression on Drug Users' HIV RisksR01DA022961 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATKIN, CARL A · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
THE LONG-TERM IMPACT OF A NETWORK OUTREACH INTERVENTIONR01DA013142 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATKIN, CARL A · 2000 to 2002
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013142NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016555NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022961NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA13142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conspiracy beliefs regarding the origins of HIV are common among African Americans, and have been associated with engaging in HIV risk behaviors but also with earlier diagnosis among HIV patients. The objective of the present study was to test the association of HIV serostatus testing with conspiracy beliefs. A total of 1430 African Americans from low-income neighborhoods with high rates of drug use were surveyed in 1997-1999 in face-to-face interviews. Two 4-point items assessed if participants agreed that "AIDS was started by an experiment that went wrong" and "AIDS was created to kill blacks and poor folks." A binary variable indicated if the respondent agreed with the statements, on average. 22.5% of the sample endorsed conspiracy beliefs, 4.0% of whom reported not having had an HIV test, compared to 7.7% of those who did not endorse conspiracy beliefs. In multivariable logistic regression modeling, never having had an HIV test was significantly associated with conspiracy beliefs (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-4.3), having a high school education (AOR = 0.55, CI = 0.35-0.84), having depression (AOR = 1.61, CI = 1.02-2.52), female gender (AOR = 0.54, CI = 0.34-0.86), younger age, and a history of injection drug use (AOR = 0.36, CI = 0.23-0.56), but not sex risk behaviors (multiple partners, irregular condom use). The finding that individuals who have conspiracy beliefs are more likely to have been tested for HIV may partially explain why HIV-positive individuals who endorse conspiracy beliefs are more likely to obtain an earlier diagnosis.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthBlack or African AmericanAdolescentAdultAgedBaltimoreCross-Sectional StudiesCultureFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID19663716
PMCPMC2788153
OpenAlexW2084237738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.