Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19662186›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry insights2007

Hazard identification on a single cell level using a laser beam.

Xing-Zheng Wu, Tomohisa Kato, Yumiko Tsuji, Satoshi Terada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry insights, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xing-Zheng WuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Fukui, Bunkyo 3-9-1, Fukui-Shi 910-8507, Japan. xingzheng.wu@matse.fukui-u.ac.jp
Tomohisa Kato
Yumiko Tsuji
Satoshi Terada

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research shows a novel method for hazard identification of a chemical and UV light on a single cell level with a laser probe beam. The laser probe beam was passed through interface of cell membrane/culture medium of a cultured human hepatoblastoma cell line HepG2. Deflection of the laser probe beam, which was induced by changes in concentration gradients due to the active materials movement across the cell membrane, was monitored. When a toxic hazard existed, a living cell was expected to be killed or injured, or cellular behaviors to be changed greatly. Then, the changing deflection signal from the living cell would become unchanged or altered in a different way. This was successfully demonstrated with cytotoxicity of UV light and H(2)O(2). Most of the cultured HepG2 cells showed changing deflection signals after 10 min illumination of UV-visible light longer than 370 nm, while almost all HepG2 cells showed unchanged deflection signal after 10 min illumination of UV-visible light with wavelength longer than 330 nm. The results suggested that UV light between 330-370 nm could kill the cells. Additions of H(2)O(2) solution with different concentrations to the cell cultures caused the changing deflection signal from a living cell either unchanged or changed in different trend, suggesting toxicity of H(2)O(2) to the cells. The results from the beam deflection detection agreed well with those obtained by the conventional trypane blue method.

Indexed as

H2O2optical beam deflectionsingle celltoxic hazardUV-visible light

Identifiers

PMID19662186
PMCPMC2716819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.