Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19661804›Full record

Trial reportCritical care medicine2010

Phase 2 trial of eritoran tetrasodium (E5564), a toll-like receptor 4 antagonist, in patients with severe sepsis.

Mark Tidswell, William Tillis, Steven P Larosa, Melvyn Lynn, Alec E Wittek, Richard Kao, Janice Wheeler, Jagadish Gogate, Steven M Opal, Eritoran Sepsis Study Group

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Mechanisms of Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Comparative analyses of monocyte memory dynamics from mice to humans.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Toll-like Receptors and Thrombopoiesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Gasdermins in sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  16. Effect of acute TLR4 inhibition on insulin resistance in humans.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022
    Article
  17. Review of potential medical treatments for middle ear cholesteatoma.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark TidswellDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA. mark.tidswell@baystatehealth.org
William Tillis
Steven P Larosa
Melvyn Lynn
Alec E Wittek
Richard Kao
Janice Wheeler
Jagadish Gogate
Steven M Opal
Eritoran Sepsis Study Group
Baystate Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEndotoxin is a potent stimulus of proinflammatory response and systemic coagulation in patients with severe sepsis. Endotoxin is a component of Gram-negative bacteria that triggers an innate immune response through Toll-like receptor 4 signaling pathways in myeloid cells. We evaluated safety and tolerability of two dose regimens of eritoran tetrasodium (E5564), a synthetic Toll-like receptor 4 antagonist, and explored whether it decreases 28-day mortality rate in subjects with severe sepsis.

designProspective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, ascending-dose phase II trial.

settingAdult intensive care units in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Three hundred adults within 12 hrs of recognition of severe sepsis, with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II-predicted risk of mortality between 20% and 80%.

interventionsIntravenous eritoran tetrasodium (total dose of either 45 mg or 105 mg) or placebo administered every 12 hrs for 6 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsPrevalence of adverse events was similar among subjects treated with 45 mg or 105 mg of eritoran tetrasodium or with placebo. For modified intent-to-treat subjects, 28-day all-cause mortality rates were 26.6% (eritoran tetrasodium 105 mg), 32.0% (eritoran tetrasodium 45 mg), and 33.3% in the placebo group. Mortality rate in the eritoran tetrasodium 105-mg group was not significantly different from placebo (p = .335). In prespecified subgroups, subjects at highest risk of mortality by APACHE II score quartile had a trend toward lower mortality rate in the eritoran tetrasodium 105-mg group (33.3% vs. 56.3% placebo group, p = .105). A trend toward a higher mortality rate was observed in subjects in the lowest APACHE II score quartile for the eritoran 105-mg group (12.0% vs. 0.0% placebo group, p = .083).

conclusionsEritoran tetrasodium treatment appears well tolerated. The observed trend toward a lower mortality rate at the 105-mg dose, in subjects with severe sepsis and high predicted risk of mortality, should be further investigated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAPACHEBacterial InfectionsCohort StudiesCritical CareCritical IllnessDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospital MortalityHumansInfusions, IntravenousIntensive Care UnitsE5564Lipid AToll-Like Receptor 4

Identifiers

PMID19661804
OpenAlexW2138167941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.