Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19661226›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2010

Perimysial fibroblasts of extraocular muscle, as unique as the muscle fibers.

Linda L Kusner, Andrew Young, Steven Tjoe, Patrick Leahy, Henry J Kaminski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Extreme Tolerance of Extraocular Muscles to Diseases and Aging: Why and How?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Postnatal changes in the developing rat extraocular muscles.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2011
    Article
  15. Connective tissue fibroblasts and Tcf4 regulate myogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda L KusnerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri 63104, USA. lkusner@slu.edu
Andrew Young
Steven Tjoe
Patrick Leahy
Henry J Kaminski
Saint Louis University · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Regulation of Extraocular Muscle DevelopmentR01EY015306 · NEI · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI KAMINSKI, HENRY J · 2004 to 2007
$1.5M
NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES OF OCULAR MUSCLER01EY013238 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KAMINSKI, HENRY J · 2001 to 2003
$574k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013238NEI NIH HHS R01EY013238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExtraocular muscle (EOM) has a distinct skeletal muscle phenotype. The hypothesis for the study was that fibroblasts support the unique EOM phenotype and that perimysial fibroblasts derived from EOM have properties that distinguish them from fibroblasts derived from other skeletal muscle.

methodsPerimysial fibroblasts from leg muscle (LM-Fibro) and EOM (EOM-Fibro) of mice were derived and maintained in culture. EOM- and LM-Fibro were assessed morphologically and for vimentin, smooth muscle actin, and Thy-1 immunoreactivity. DNA microarray analysis was performed on LM- and EOM-Fibro grown in conditions that support myoblast differentiation. To assess trophic interactions, co-cultures of myoblasts from established cell lines, CL-EOM and CL-LM with, EOM- or LM-Fibro were performed in direct contact and in a permeable filter support culture. The degree of myotube maturation was assessed by the percentage of myotubes with more than three myonuclei per myotube.

resultsEOM- and LM-Fibro cells exhibited distinct morphologies. Both cell types proliferated as a monolayer and expressed vimentin. Fifty-five percent (SD 4.4%) of EOM-Fibro were Thy-1 positive compared with only 24% (SD 4.4%) of LM-Fibro. DNA microarray analysis demonstrated differential expression of structural, immune response, and metabolism-related genes between EOM- and LM-Fibro. Co-cultures demonstrated that mature myotube formation in EOM-derived cell lines was supported to a greater extent by EOM-Fibro than by LM-Fibro, compared with CL-EOM grown with LM-Fibro.

conclusionsFibroblasts from EOM demonstrate distinct properties that distinguish them from leg muscle-derived fibroblasts. The distinct properties of EOM-Fibro may support the unique EOM phenotype and contribute to their differential involvement in disease.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesFibroblastsFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectGene Expression ProfilingHindlimbMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMyoblastsOculomotor MusclesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisActa2 protein, mouseActinsThy-1 AntigensVimentin

Identifiers

PMID19661226
PMCPMC2869047
OpenAlexW2009755572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.