ReviewDer Orthopade2009
[Revision strategy for periprosthetic infection].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- First experiences with negative pressure wound therapy and instillation in the treatment of infected orthopaedic implants: a clinical observational study.International orthopaedics · 2011Trial
- A Low Rate of Periprosthetic Infections after Aseptic Knee Prosthesis Revision Using Dual-Antibiotic-Impregnated Bone Cement.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- [Periprosthetic joint infections : Latest developments, strategies and treatment algorithms].Der Orthopade · 2020Review
- [Pathophysiology of implant-associated infections: From biofilm to osteolysis and septic loosening].Der Orthopade · 2015Review
- [Diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infections].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2015Article
- [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].Der Orthopade · 2015Article
- Surgical treatment approaches and reimbursement costs of surgical site infections post hip arthroplasty in Australia: a retrospective analysis.BMC health services research · 2013Article
- [Standards of microbiological diagnostics of spondylodiscitis].Der Orthopade · 2012Article
- Chronic infections in hip arthroplasties: comparing risk of reinfection following one-stage and two-stage revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical epidemiology · 2012Article
- [Hip joint infections - Results of a questionnaire among 28 university orthopedic departments].Der Orthopade · 2011Article
- Management of the infected shoulder prosthesis: a retrospective analysis and review of the literature.International orthopaedics · 2011Review
- [Bacterial infections of the rheumatoid foot].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2010Article
- [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periprosthetic infection remains a major complication in arthroplasty; increasing numbers of primary and revision arthroplasties are being followed by increasing numbers of periprosthetic infections. In cases of possible infection, the surgeon must have a treatment concept that can be individually adjusted. Diagnosis is a challenge and should include a variety of investigations. In early and secondary infections, component retention can be successful. Surgical debridement is the key to success. All late and chronic infections should be treated by explantation of all components because of infection with biofilm-producing microbes. The individual patient's situation and the surgeon's experience should determine whether to choose direct single-stage or two-stage revision. New diagnostic and therapeutic procedures can improve outcomes but cannot replace the need for prophylactic efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.