Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2009
CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Water Exchange Versus Carbon Dioxide Insufflation to Improve Colonoscopy Screening - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Is End Tidal CO2 Level Elevation During Upper Endoscopy With CO2 Gas Insufflation Physiologically Significant
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis of carbon dioxide versus room air insufflation on patient comfort and key performance indicators at colonoscopy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Pooled it
- Carbon dioxide insufflation during screening unsedated colonoscopy: a randomised clinical trial.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2015Trial
- Surgical Decision-Making in Colonoscopic Perforation: Predictors and Optimal Timing of Intervention in a 20-Year Single-Center Cohort.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide versus room-air insufflation in pediatric colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2025Article
- Carbon dioxide versus room air for colonoscopy in deeply sedated pediatric patients: a randomized controlled trial.Endoscopy international open · 2019Article
- 2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2018Review
- Review
- Does carbon dioxide insufflation impact adenoma detection rate? A single-center retrospective analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2016Article
- Complications during colonoscopy: prevention, diagnosis, and management.Techniques in coloproctology · 2015Review
- Is the type of insufflation a key issue in gastro-intestinal endoscopy?World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- The water method is effective in difficult colonoscopy - it enhances cecal intubation in unsedated patients with a history of abdominal surgery.Journal of interventional gastroenterology · 2011Article
- DDW 2011 cutting edge colonoscopy techniques - state of the art lecture master class - warm water infusion/CO(2) insufflation for colonoscopy.Journal of interventional gastroenterology · 2011Article
- Carbon dioxide insufflation in routine colonoscopy is safe and more comfortable: results of a randomized controlled double-blinded trial.Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAir insufflation during colonoscopy is considered the standard method in most endoscopic centers. Notably, several studies have reported reduced abdominal pain after colonoscopy with CO2 insufflation in unsedated and in lightly sedated patients. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy of CO2 insufflation after colonoscopy in moderately and deeply sedated patients. We also evaluated whether CO2 insufflation increases patients' compliance for colorectal cancer screening. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 300 consecutive patients allocated to colonoscopy were randomly assigned to either CO2 or air insufflation. Propofol was titrated to a level of deep sedation and propofol combined with midazolam was used for moderate sedation. Post-interventional pain levels and satisfaction with the procedure were registered on a 10-point visual analog scale. Compliance for colorectal cancer screening was ascertained separately.
resultsCO2 insufflation was used during colonoscopy in 157 patients; conventional air was used in 143 patients. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex and body mass index. Neither major nor minor complications were observed. Pain sensation was significantly lower in the CO2 group at 15 min, 30 min and 6 h after colonoscopy (P<0.01); at 12 h no difference was observed. In contrast, levels of patient satisfaction did not show any significant difference. Voluntary colorectal cancer screening appeared not to be influenced by the type of insufflation gas used.
conclusionsCO2 insufflation in deeply and moderately sedated patients during colonoscopy has no impact on patients' satisfaction with the procedure or on their attitude to voluntary colorectal cancer screening. However, the use of CO2 insufflation significantly diminishes abdominal pain after colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.