Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19657610›Full record

Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2009

CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Stefan Riss, Belgin Akan, Barbara Mikola, Erwin Rieder, Judith Karner-Hanusch, Dragos Dirlea, Martina Mittlböck, Friedrich Anton Weiser

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01633333 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Water Exchange Versus Carbon Dioxide Insufflation to Improve Colonoscopy Screening - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSorlandet Hospital HFRan2012 to 2013Enrolled473ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colorectal Adenomas, Colorectal Polyps, PainArmsWater exchange colonoscopy, Carbon dioxide insufflation
NCT04541667 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Is End Tidal CO2 Level Elevation During Upper Endoscopy With CO2 Gas Insufflation Physiologically Significant

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NebraskaRan2019 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsEndoscopyArmsAir, Carbon Dioxide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Carbon dioxide insufflation during screening unsedated colonoscopy: a randomised clinical trial.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2015
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefan RissDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. stefan.riss@meduniwien.ac.at
Belgin Akan
Barbara Mikola
Erwin Rieder
Judith Karner-Hanusch
Dragos Dirlea
Martina Mittlböck
Friedrich Anton Weiser
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAir insufflation during colonoscopy is considered the standard method in most endoscopic centers. Notably, several studies have reported reduced abdominal pain after colonoscopy with CO2 insufflation in unsedated and in lightly sedated patients. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy of CO2 insufflation after colonoscopy in moderately and deeply sedated patients. We also evaluated whether CO2 insufflation increases patients' compliance for colorectal cancer screening. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 300 consecutive patients allocated to colonoscopy were randomly assigned to either CO2 or air insufflation. Propofol was titrated to a level of deep sedation and propofol combined with midazolam was used for moderate sedation. Post-interventional pain levels and satisfaction with the procedure were registered on a 10-point visual analog scale. Compliance for colorectal cancer screening was ascertained separately.

resultsCO2 insufflation was used during colonoscopy in 157 patients; conventional air was used in 143 patients. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, sex and body mass index. Neither major nor minor complications were observed. Pain sensation was significantly lower in the CO2 group at 15 min, 30 min and 6 h after colonoscopy (P<0.01); at 12 h no difference was observed. In contrast, levels of patient satisfaction did not show any significant difference. Voluntary colorectal cancer screening appeared not to be influenced by the type of insufflation gas used.

conclusionsCO2 insufflation in deeply and moderately sedated patients during colonoscopy has no impact on patients' satisfaction with the procedure or on their attitude to voluntary colorectal cancer screening. However, the use of CO2 insufflation significantly diminishes abdominal pain after colonoscopy.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyAbdominal PainAdultAnti-Anxiety AgentsBody Mass IndexCarbon DioxideColorectal NeoplasmsDrug CombinationsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMidazolamPain MeasurementPatient ComplianceAnti-Anxiety AgentsCarbon DioxideDrug CombinationsHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamPropofol

Identifiers

PMID19657610
OpenAlexW1480069200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.