Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19657576›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2009

Anatomy-specific pancreatic stump management to reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection.

Yoshitsugu Tajima, Tamotsu Kuroki, Noritsugu Tsuneoka, Tomohiko Adachi, Taiichiro Kosaka, Tatsuya Okamoto, Mitsuhisa Takatsuki, Susumu Eguchi, Takashi Kanematsu

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unraveling Pancreatic Segmentation.World journal of surgery · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoshitsugu TajimaDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan. ytajima@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp
Tamotsu Kuroki
Noritsugu Tsuneoka
Tomohiko Adachi
Taiichiro Kosaka
Tatsuya Okamoto
Mitsuhisa Takatsuki
Susumu Eguchi
Takashi Kanematsu
Nagasaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anatomical status of the pancreatic remnant after a pancreatic head resection varies greatly among patients. The aim of the present study was to improve management of the pancreatic remnant for reducing pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection.

methodsNinety-five consecutive patients who underwent an end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatic head resection were included in the study. To approximate the pancreatic stump to the jejunum, the transfixing and interrupted suture techniques were used in 51 and 44 patients, respectively. We modified the interrupted suture technique according to the anatomical status of the pancreatic remnant, i.e., the shape of the pancreatic stump and the location of the pancreatic duct.

resultsThere was no operative mortality in this study. Overall, 14 patients (15%) developed a clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. Certain anatomical features, including a small pancreatic duct, a soft, nonfibrotic pancreatic gland, and a pancreatic duct adjacent to the posterior cut edge, were significantly associated with pancreatic fistula. The fistula rate in the interrupted suture group was 7%, lower than that (22%) in the transfixing suture group (P = 0.036), and it was not influenced by pancreatic anatomy. Multivariate analysis identified a nonfibrotic pancreas (versus fibrotic pancreas; odds ratio [OR] 12.58, 95% CI 1.2-23.9; P = 0.001), a soft pancreas (versus hard pancreas; OR 4.67, CI 1.2-51.1; P = 0.006), and the transfixing suture technique (versus interrupted suture technique; OR 9.91, CI 1.7-57.5; P = 0.003) as significant predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

conclusionsPancreatic anastomosis modified according to the pancreatic anatomy is effective in reducing the risk of pancreatic fistula formation with end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatic head resection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatectomyPancreatic FistulaPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticojejunostomyPancreatitis, ChronicSuture TechniquesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19657576
OpenAlexW1979211362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.