Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19657349›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of impotence research

Reliability of efficacy in men with erectile dysfunction treated with tadalafil once daily after initial success.

R Shabsigh, C Donatucci, R Costabile, M A Perelman, P Burns, H Zeigler, D G Wong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of impotence research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

R ShabsighMaimonides Medical Center and Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. rshabsigh@maimonidesmed.org
C Donatucci
R Costabile
M A Perelman
P Burns
H Zeigler
D G Wong
Eli Lilly (United States) · USDuke Medical Center · USMaimonides Medical Center · USPresbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reliability of response to treatment is an important component of erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment. This study examined the reliability of tadalafil once daily (that is, successful attempts/total attempts) following initial successful intercourse. Data pooled from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of men with ED who received tadalafil 2.5 mg (N=96), tadalafil 5 mg (N=206) or placebo (N=148) once daily were analyzed to determine the first-attempt success rate and subsequent reliability of response. The first-attempt success rate (Sexual Encounter Profile question 3 (SEP3)) was significantly higher among men taking tadalafil 2.5 mg (45.7%) and 5 mg (55.2%) compared to placebo (28.5%; P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, following initial success, men taking tadalafil 5 mg had a significantly greater proportion of successful intercourse (SEP3) on subsequent attempts (85.9%, P<0.001) compared to men taking placebo (70.2%). Overall, men with ED taking tadalafil once daily experienced a high rate of reliability of efficacy.

Indexed as

AgedCarbolinesCoitusCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5Double-Blind MethodErectile DysfunctionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPhosphodiesterase InhibitorsReproducibility of ResultsSexualityTadalafilTreatment OutcomeCarbolinesCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5Phosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsPhosphodiesterase InhibitorsTadalafil

Identifiers

PMID19657349
OpenAlexW2000105334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.