ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009
Performance of the new Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan version 2.0 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 assay.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate HIV viral load measurement in primary health care settings using the cobas® plasma separation card.PloS one · 2020Article
- Viral genetic variation accounts for a third of variability in HIV-1 set-point viral load in Europe.PLoS biology · 2017Article
- Sensitivity and specificity of dried blood spots for HIV-1 viral load quantification: A laboratory assessment of 3 commercial assays.Medicine · 2016Article
- Concordance of HIV-1 RNA Values by Amplicor and TaqMan 2.0 in Patients With Confirmed Suppression in Clinical Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Article
- Comparison of the Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test v1.0 with v2.0 in HIV-1 viral load quantification.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2015Article
- Detection of Acute HIV-1 Infection by RT-LAMP.PloS one · 2015Article
- Ability of two commercially available assays (Abbott RealTime HIV-1 and Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 Version 2.0) to quantify low HIV-1 RNA Levels (<1,000 copies/milliliter): comparison with clinical samples and NIBSC working reagent for nucleic acid testing assays.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Comparison of the COBAS/Ampliprep Taqman and Amplicor HIV-1 monitor tests in Lagos, Nigeria.African journal of laboratory medicine · 2013Article
- Use of a prequalification panel for rapid scale-up of high-throughput HIV viral load testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Early diagnosis of in utero and intrapartum HIV infection in infants prior to 6 weeks of age.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Current practices in laboratory monitoring of HIV infection.The Indian journal of medical research · 2011Review
- Abbott RealTime HIV-1 m2000rt viral load testing: manual extraction versus the automated m2000sp extraction.Journal of virological methods · 2011Article
- Comparative evaluation of the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 2 test using the TaqMan 48 analyzer and the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2011Article
- HIV-1 load comparison using four commercial real-time assays.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2011Article
- Potential influence of more-sensitive HIV-1 load detection by the new Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan version 2.0 assay on clinical management of HIV-positive pregnant women.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.