ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2009
Clinical analysis of patients who survived for less than 3 months after brain metastatectomy.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Brain metastases from ovarian carcinoma.ISRN oncology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the patients with brain metastasis (BM), it is impossible to determine who will benefit from surgery because of limited survival. In an attempt to identify optimal candidates for brain metastatectomy, we analyzed patients who survived for <3 months after craniotomy for a single BM lesion. Between January 1st, 1997 and July 31st, 2007, 83 patients with a single BM underwent craniotomy. Of these patients, 25 patients (30.1%) died within 3 months of craniotomy. The primary lesions were non-small call lung cancer in 15, colon cancer in 6, and breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, ovarian cancer, or esophageal cancer in one apiece. Of the 25 patients, 19 (79%) were of tumor stage IV and had extra-cranial metastasis. Eleven (44%) of the 25 primary cancers had a well-controlled status. Twelve patients (48%) had a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score of <70, and 13 (52%) were of Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) class 3. Primary cancer status, RPA class, and functional status were found to be critical factors for consideration when selecting surgical candidates. In addition, adjuvant therapy was found to have an important role on survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.