Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19654505›Full record

Trial reportBehavioural pharmacology2009

Performance and subjective effects of diazepam and d-amphetamine in high and low sensation seekers.

Thomas H Kelly, Timothy A Delzer, Catherine A Martin, Nancy G Harrington, Lon R Hays, Michael T Bardo

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavioural pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effects of 24 hours of tobacco withdrawal and subsequent tobacco smoking among low and high sensation seekers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2011
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Similarities and Differences in Psychology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Biomedicines · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Novelty Seeking as a Phenotypic Marker of Adolescent Substance Use.Substance abuse : research and treatment · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Amphetamine self-administration in light and moderate drinkers.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas H KellyDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA. thkelly@uky.edu
Timothy A Delzer
Catherine A Martin
Nancy G Harrington
Lon R Hays
Michael T Bardo
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Training and Pilot CoreP50DA005312 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 1987 to 2016
$19.5M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005312PHS HHS P50 05312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although sensation-seeking status is associated with age of initiation and amount of drug use among adolescents, and sensitivity to the behavioral and reinforcing effects of drugs among young adults, it is unclear whether sensation-seeking status among adolescents is predictive of sensitivity to the pharmacological effects of drugs (i.e. abuse potential) as adults. This study examined the acute behavioral effects of oral diazepam and d-amphetamine in young adults, ages 18-21 years, who had consistently scored in the highest or lowest third of their grade-based cohort on a modified Sensation Seeking Scale that was completed annually between ages 10 and 14 years. Healthy participants completed 16 7.5-h test days, with test days separated by a minimum of 48 h. Each day, assessments consisting of computer task performance, verbal report of drug effects, and cardiovascular measures were completed 0, 50, 110, 170, 230, and 290 min after drug administration. Placebo and three active doses of diazepam and d-amphetamine (2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 mg/70 kg) were tested under double-blind conditions according to a randomized-block design. Typical stimulant and sedative effects were obtained with d-amphetamine and diazepam, respectively. Drug effects varied as a function of sensation-seeking status, with magnitude of effects on cardiovascular function, task performance, and report of positive drug effects being greater among high sensation seekers, and report of negative drug effects being greater among low sensation seekers. Adolescents who report high levels of sensation seeking on a consistent basis are more sensitive to pharmacological effects of stimulant and sedative drugs that are associated with abuse potential as young adults.

Indexed as

AdolescentAmphetamineAnalysis of VarianceAnti-Anxiety AgentsBlood PressureCentral Nervous System StimulantsCohort StudiesDiazepamDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodExploratory BehaviorFemaleHeart RateHumansMalePain MeasurementAmphetamineAnti-Anxiety AgentsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDiazepam

Identifiers

PMID19654505
PMCPMC3148198
OpenAlexW2093372795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.