Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19652948›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2009

The effects of etomidate on adrenal responsiveness and mortality in patients with septic shock.

Brian H Cuthbertson, Charles L Sprung, Djillali Annane, Sylvie Chevret, Mark Garfield, Serge Goodman, Pierre-Francois Laterre, Jean Louis Vincent, Klaus Freivogel, Konrad Reinhart and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Comparison of Adrenal Suppression between Etomidate and Dexmedetomidine in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Evidence-based Emergency Tracheal Intubation.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. An Expiration Date for Etomidate?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Brian H CuthbertsonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. b.h.cuthbertson@abdn.ac.uk
Charles L Sprung
Djillali Annane
Sylvie Chevret
Mark Garfield
Serge Goodman
Pierre-Francois Laterre
Jean Louis Vincent
Klaus Freivogel
Konrad Reinhart
Mervyn Singer
Didier Payen
Yoram G Weiss
Hadassah Medical Center · ILErasmus Hospital · BEHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILHôpital Lariboisière · FRInstitut Lavoisier de Versailles · FRIpswich Hospital · GBSaint Louis University Hospital · USSchiller International University · FRUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleUse of etomidate in the critically ill is controversial due to its links with an inadequate response to corticotropin and potential for excess mortality. In a septic shock population, we tested the hypotheses that etomidate administration induces more non-responders to corticotropin and increases mortality and that hydrocortisone treatment decreases mortality in patients receiving etomidate.

methodsAn a-priori sub-study of the CORTICUS multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of hydrocortisone in septic shock. Use and timing of etomidate administration were collected. Endpoints were corticotropin response and all-cause 28-day mortality in patients receiving etomidate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsFive hundred patients were recruited, of whom 499 were analysable; 96 (19.2%) were administered etomidate within the 72 h prior to inclusion. The proportion of non-responders to corticotropin was significantly higher in patients who were given etomidate in the 72 h before trial inclusion than in other patients (61.0 vs. 44.6%, P = 0.004). Etomidate therapy was associated with a higher 28-day mortality in univariate analysis (P = 0.02) and after correction for severity of illness (42.7 vs. 30.5%; P = 0.06 and P = 0.03) in our two multi-variant models. Hydrocortisone administration did not change the mortality of patients receiving etomidate (45 vs. 40%).

conclusionsThe use of bolus dose etomidate in the 72 h before study inclusion is associated with an increased incidence of inadequate response to corticotropin, but is also likely to be associated with an increase in mortality. We recommend clinicians demonstrate extreme caution in the use of etomidate in critically ill patients with septic shock.

Indexed as

Adrenocorticotropic HormoneAdrenal GlandsAgedAnalysis of VarianceAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCause of DeathCritical CareDouble-Blind MethodDrug AntagonismEtomidateEuropeFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneHypnotics and SedativesKaplan-Meier EstimateAdrenocorticotropic HormoneAnti-Inflammatory AgentsEtomidateHydrocortisonehydrocortisone hemisuccinateHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID19652948
OpenAlexW2097513009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.