Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19652934›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2009

Amphotericin B lozengers: prophylaxis for esophagitis in thoracic radiotherapy: a prospective study.

Karl Wurstbauer, Florian Merz, Felix Sedlmayer

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Radiation-induced oesophagitis in lung cancer patients. Is susceptibility for neutropenia a risk factor?Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2012
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Non-small cell lung cancer in stages I-IIIB: Long-term results of definitive radiotherapy with doses ≥ 80 Gy in standard fractionation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Karl WurstbauerUniversity Clinic of Radiation Oncology, Salzburger Landeskliniken und Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Salzburg, Austria. k.wurstbauer@salk.at
Florian Merz
Felix Sedlmayer
Salzburger Landeskliniken · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeEsophagitis is an important side effect in thoracic radiotherapy, no preventive drug therapy has been established yet. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic antimycotic treatment with amphotericin B lozengers. PATIENTS AND

methods40 consecutive patients with high-dose thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer were investigated in a nonrandomized study. 20 patients receiving a median maximal esophageal dose of 67 Gy (range 61-80 Gy) were treated with amphotericin B lozengers four times daily from day 8 to the end of radiotherapy. Another 20 patients with a lower median maximal esophageal dose of 60 Gy (range 51-67.5 Gy) constituted the control group. Length of the irradiated esophagus and dose-length indices were evaluated. Side effects were prospectively scored according to the RTOG/EORTC criteria. There was a trend toward higher esophageal volumes in the prophylaxis group; furthermore, patients in this group were older, had a worse median Karnofsky Index and had more often received induction chemotherapy.

resultsIn the prophylaxis group, 15 patients remained free from esophagitis and five patients developed esophagitis grade 1. In the control group, four patients remained free from symptoms, 14 patients showed esophagitis grade 1 and two patients grade 2. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The start of symptoms was delayed in the prophylaxis group in comparison to the control group: day 21 (median, range 14-44) and day 18 (median, range 10-32) respectively. Amphotericin B lozengers were tolerated without side effects by all patients.

conclusionProphylactic administration of amphotericin B lozengers seems to effectively prevent radiation-induced esophagitis.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsCandidiasisCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Small CellEsophagitisEsophagusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedAmphotericin BAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID19652934
OpenAlexW1480257446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.