Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19652056›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2009

Impact of baseline BCR-ABL mutations on response to nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase.

Timothy Hughes, Giuseppe Saglio, Susan Branford, Simona Soverini, Dong-Wook Kim, Martin C Müller, Giovanni Martinelli, Jorge Cortes, Lan Beppu, Enrico Gottardi and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 308 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Version 1.2014.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2013
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Acquired resistance to molecularly targeted therapies for cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Timothy HughesInstitute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Hanson Center for Cancer Research, Department of Hematology, Adelaide, 5000, Australia. Timothy.hughes@imvs.sa.gov.au
Giuseppe Saglio
Susan Branford
Simona Soverini
Dong-Wook Kim
Martin C Müller
Giovanni Martinelli
Jorge Cortes
Lan Beppu
Enrico Gottardi
Dongho Kim
Philipp Erben
Yaping Shou
Ariful Haque
Neil Gallagher
Jerald Radich
Andreas Hochhaus
South Australia Pathology · AUCatholic University of Korea · KRHanson Institute · AUFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNovartis (United States) · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNilotinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP; CML-CP) and accelerated phase (AP; CML-AP) who are resistant to or intolerant of prior imatinib therapy. In this subanalysis of a phase II study of nilotinib in patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML-CP, the occurrence and impact of baseline and newly detectable BCR-ABL mutations were assessed. PATIENTS AND

methodsBaseline mutation data were assessed in 281 (88%) of 321 patients with CML-CP in the phase II nilotinib registration trial.

resultsAmong imatinib-resistant patients, the frequency of mutations at baseline was 55%. After 12 months of therapy, major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 60%, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in 40%, and major molecular response (MMR) in 29% of patients without baseline mutations versus 49% (P = .145), 32% (P = .285), and 22% (P = .366), respectively, of patients with mutations. Responses in patients who harbored mutations with high in vitro sensitivity to nilotinib (50% inhibitory concentration [IC(50)] <or= 150 nM) or mutations with unknown nilotinib sensitivity were equivalent to those responses for patients without mutations (not significant). Patients with mutations that were less sensitive to nilotinib in vitro (IC(50) > 150 nM; Y253H, E255V/K, F359V/C) had less favorable responses, as 13%, 43%, and 9% of patients with each of these mutations, respectively, achieved MCyR; none achieved CCyR.

conclusionFor most patients with imatinib resistance and with mutations, nilotinib offers a substantial probability of response. However, mutational status at baseline may influence response. Less sensitive mutations that occurred at three residues defined in this study, as well as the T315I mutation, may be associated with less favorable responses to nilotinib.

Indexed as

MutationAntineoplastic AgentsAustraliaBenzamidesDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEuropeFusion Proteins, bcr-ablGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, LeukemicHumansImatinib MesylateKoreaLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositivePiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesabl-bcr fusion protein, humanAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesFusion Proteins, bcr-ablImatinib MesylatenilotinibPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID19652056
PMCPMC4979230
OpenAlexW1995670055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.