Trial reportCurrent medical research and opinion2009
Effect of saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.
Trial report in Current medical research and opinion, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00121641. Cited by 95 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin (BMS-477118) as Monotherapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control With Diet and Exercise
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
95 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 288 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on postprandial glucagon level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systemic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- Age, sex, disease severity, and disease duration difference in placebo response: implications from a meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus.BMC medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Insulin and glucose-lowering agents for treating people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on beta-cell function and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Factors Related to the Glucose-Lowering Efficacy of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Ethnicity and Study Regions.Clinical drug investigation · 2017Pooled it
- The placebo response of injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists vs. oral DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT-2 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Pooled it
- Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and risk of heart failure in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.International journal of clinical practice · 2013Pooled it
- Differences in the glucose-lowering efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors between Asians and non-Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetologia · 2013Pooled it
- Saxagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: assessing cardiovascular data.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2012Pooled it
- [Recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes].Atencion primaria · 2011Guideline
- Efficacy of Gemigliptin Add-on to Dapagliflozin and Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study (SOLUTION).Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 24-week multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2016Trial
- Effect of Linagliptin on Glycemic Control in Chinese Patients with Newly-Diagnosed, Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015Trial
- Bioequivalence of saxagliptin/metformin extended-release (XR) fixed-dose combination tablets and single-component saxagliptin and metformin XR tablets in healthy adult Chinese subjects.Clinical drug investigation · 2014Trial
- Tolerability and efficacy of glycemic control with saxagliptin in older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.Clinical interventions in aging · 2013Trial
- Pharmacokinetic study of saxagliptin in healthy Chinese subjects.Clinical drug investigation · 2012Trial
35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and inadequate glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis study included a main treatment cohort (MTC) with 401 patients (HbA(1c) > or = 7% and < or =10%) randomized and treated with oral saxagliptin 2.5, 5, or 10 mg once daily or placebo for 24 weeks and a separate open-label cohort (OLC) with 66 patients (HbA(1c) > 10% and < or =12%) who received saxagliptin 10 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was HbA(1c) change from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 24 in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), proportion of patients achieving HbA(1c) < 7%, and changes in postprandial glucose area-under-the-curve (PPG-AUC). Efficacy analyses for continuous variables were performed using an ANCOVA model with last-observation-carried-forward methodology.
resultsIn the MTC, saxagliptin demonstrated statistically significant decreases in adjusted mean HbA(1c) changes from baseline (mean, 7.9%) to week 24 (-0.43%, -0.46%, -0.54%) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, vs. +0.19% for placebo (all p < 0.0001). Adjusted mean FPG was significantly reduced from baseline (-15, -9, -17 mg/dL) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, vs. +6 mg/dL for placebo (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0074, p < 0.0001, respectively). More saxagliptin-treated patients achieved HbA(1c) < 7% at week 24 (35% [p = NS], 38% [p = 0.0443], 41% [p = 0.0133]) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, than placebo (24%). PPG-AUC was reduced for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg (-6868, -6896, -8084 mg x min/dL, respectively) vs. placebo (-647 mg x min/dL) with statistical significance demonstrated for saxagliptin 5 mg (p = 0.0002) and 10 mg (p < 0.0001). HbA(1c), FPG, and PPG-AUC reductions were also observed in the OLC at 24 weeks. In the MTC, adverse event frequency was similar across all study arms. No cases of confirmed hypoglycemia (symptoms, with fingerstick glucose < or =50 mg/dL) were observed in either cohort. Saxagliptin was not associated with weight gain. Study limitations included the lack of a control group for the OLC and the use of prespecified rescue criteria, which limited the exposure time during which patients could remain on their originally randomized medication without the introduction of additional antihyperglycemic rescue treatment.
conclusionsOnce-daily saxagliptin monotherapy for 24 weeks was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in key parameters of glycemic control vs. placebo.
trial registrationClinical Trials NCT00121641
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.