Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19650669›Full record

ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2009

Molecular diagnostics in tuberculosis: basis and implications for therapy.

Seetha V Balasingham, Tonje Davidsen, Irena Szpinda, Stephan A Frye, Tone Tønjum

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A pilot study on the genetic diversity ofJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2020
    Article
  3. Genotype analysis of ofloxacin-resistant multidrug-resistantThe Indian journal of medical research · 2020
    Article
  4. Molecular Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.Chonnam medical journal · 2018
    Review
  5. [New microbiological techniques].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates resistant to kanamycin, amikacin, and capreomycin in China.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Emerging advances in rapid diagnostics of respiratory infections.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2010
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seetha V BalasinghamCentre for Molecular Biology and Neuroscience, Institute of Microbiology, University of Oslo, Norway.
Tonje Davidsen
Irena Szpinda
Stephan A Frye
Tone Tønjum
University of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processing of clinical specimens in the mycobacterial diagnostic laboratory has undergone remarkable improvements during the last decade. While microscopy and culture are still the major backbone for laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis on a worldwide basis, new methods including molecular diagnostic tests have evolved over the last two decades. The majority of molecular tests have been focused on (i) detection of nucleic acids, both DNA and RNA, that are specific to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, by amplification techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR); and (ii) detection of mutations in the genes that are associated with resistance to antituberculosis drugs by sequencing or nucleic acid hybridization. Recent developments in direct and rapid detection of mycobacteria, with emphasis on M. tuberculosis species identification by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis or oligohybridization and strain typing, as well as detection of drug susceptibility patterns, all contribute to these advances. Generally, the balance between genome instability and genome maintenance as the basis for evolutionary development, strain diversification and resistance development is important, because it cradles the resulting M. tuberculosis phenotype. At the same time, semi-automated culture systems have contributed greatly to the increased sensitivity and reduced turnaround time in the mycobacterial analysis of clinical specimens. Collectively, these advances are particularly important for establishing the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children. More basic and operational research to appraise the impact and cost effectiveness of new diagnostic technologies must, however, be carried out. Furthermore, the design and quality of clinical trials evaluating new diagnostics must be improved to allow clinical and laboratory services that would provide rapid response to test results. Thus, important work remains before the new diagnostic tools can be meaningfully integrated into national tuberculosis control programs of high-burden countries.

Indexed as

Molecular Diagnostic TechniquesAnimalsGenomic InstabilityHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologyMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID19650669
OpenAlexW300344787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.