Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19648524›Full record

ReviewThe European respiratory journal2009

High-throughput molecular analysis in lung cancer: insights into biology and potential clinical applications.

S Ocak, M L Sos, R K Thomas, P P Massion

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European respiratory journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Article
  9. The Downregulation ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Discovery of new membrane-associated proteins overexpressed in small-cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2014
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Evolving concepts in lung carcinogenesis.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S OcakDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37232-6838, USA.
M L Sos
R K Thomas
P P Massion
Max Planck Society · DEVanderbilt University · US

Funding

TARGETING NOTCH 3 IN LUNG CANCERP50CA090949 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MASSION, PIERRE P. · 2001 to 2011
$24.1M
Molecular Approaches to Early Detection of Lung CancerR01CA102353 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MASSION, PIERRE P. · 2005 to 2014
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA102353NCI NIH HHS CA90949NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090949NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decade, high-throughput technologies including genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic and proteomic have been applied to further our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of this heterogeneous disease, and to develop strategies that aim to improve the management of patients with lung cancer. Ultimately, these approaches should lead to sensitive, specific and noninvasive methods for early diagnosis, and facilitate the prediction of response to therapy and outcome, as well as the identification of potential novel therapeutic targets. Genomic studies were the first to move this field forward by providing novel insights into the molecular biology of lung cancer and by generating candidate biomarkers of disease progression. Lung carcinogenesis is driven by genetic and epigenetic alterations that cause aberrant gene function; however, the challenge remains to pinpoint the key regulatory control mechanisms and to distinguish driver from passenger alterations that may have a small but additive effect on cancer development. Epigenetic regulation by DNA methylation and histone modifications modulate chromatin structure and, in turn, either activate or silence gene expression. Proteomic approaches critically complement these molecular studies, as the phenotype of a cancer cell is determined by proteins and cannot be predicted by genomics or transcriptomics alone. The present article focuses on the technological platforms available and some proposed clinical applications. We illustrate herein how the "-omics" have revolutionised our approach to lung cancer biology and hold promise for personalised management of lung cancer.

Indexed as

BiomarkersChromatinDisease ProgressionDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHistonesHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasmsNucleic Acid HybridizationProtein Array AnalysisProteomicsTranscription, GeneticBiomarkersChromatinHistones

Identifiers

PMID19648524
PMCPMC4648268
OpenAlexW2122852923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.