Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19648384›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2009

Impact of asthma controller medications on clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Hiangkiat Tan, Chaitanya Sarawate, Joseph Singer, Kurt Elward, Rubin I Cohen, Brian A Smart, Michael F Busk, James Lustig, Jeana D O'Brien, Michael Schatz

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Asthma outcomes: composite scores of asthma control.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hiangkiat TanHealth Outcomes Research, HealthCore, Wilmington, DE 19801, USA. jtan@healthcore.com
Chaitanya Sarawate
Joseph Singer
Kurt Elward
Rubin I Cohen
Brian A Smart
Michael F Busk
James Lustig
Jeana D O'Brien
Michael Schatz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo comprehensively evaluate clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes associated with various therapeutic classes of asthma controller medications. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis observational study, which used administrative claims data from US commercial health plans, included patients with asthma aged 18 through 64 years who filled a prescription for at least 1 asthma controller medication from September 1, 2003, through August 31, 2005. Outcome metrics included the use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs), the use of oral corticosteroids, inpatient (INP)/emergency department (ED) visits, and asthma-related health care costs. A subset of 5000 patients was randomly selected for a survey using the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire.

resultsOf 56,168 eligible patients, 823 returned completed questionnaires. Compared with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), leukotriene modifiers (LMs) were associated with lower odds of INP/ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; P<.001), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.81; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($193; P<.001). In the subgroup analysis of adherent patients, LMs were associated with higher odds of INP/ED visits (OR, 1.74; P=.04), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.46; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($235; P<.001). Inhaled corticosteroids and LMs had a comparable impact on all patient-reported outcomes. For combination therapy, ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist consistently showed at least equivalent or better outcomes in the use of SABAs and oral corticosteroids, the risk of INP/ED visits, cost, asthma control level, quality of life, and impairment in productivity and activity.

conclusionInhaled corticosteroids were associated with a lower risk of INP/ED visits, and a lower cost if adherence was achieved. When adherence cannot be achieved, LMs may be a reasonable alternative. Combination therapy with ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist was associated with better or equivalent clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdministration, InhalationAdministration, OralAdolescentAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaCost-Benefit AnalysisDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug UtilizationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic AgentsLeukotrienes

Identifiers

PMID19648384
PMCPMC2719520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.