Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19647203›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2009

Genotype-guided tamoxifen therapy: time to pause for reflection?

Timothy L Lash, Ernst A Lien, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CYP2D6 Phenotype and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Bias Analysis and Meta-Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bayesian Pathway Analysis for Complex Interactions.American journal of epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Metabolic Pathway Analysis and Effectiveness of Tamoxifen in Danish Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Timothy L LashDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA. tlash@bu.edu
Ernst A Lien
Henrik Toft Sørensen
Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit
Aarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

Modification of tamoxifen effectiveness by gene polymorphisms and other drugsR01CA118708 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI LASH, TIMOTHY L. · 2006 to 2009
$963k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tamoxifen remains a cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for patients with early stage breast cancer and oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours. Accurate markers of tamoxifen resistance would allow prediction of tamoxifen response and personalisation of combined therapies. Recently, it has been suggested that patients with inherited non-functional alleles of the cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 might be poor candidates for adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, because women with these variant alleles have reduced concentrations of the tamoxifen metabolites that most strongly bind the oestrogen receptor. In some studies, women with these alleles have a higher risk of recurrence than women with two functional alleles. However, dose-setting studies with clinical and biomarker outcomes, studies associating clinical outcomes with serum concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites, and a simple model of receptor binding, all suggest that tamoxifen and its metabolites should reach concentrations sufficient to achieve the therapeutic effect regardless of CYP2D6 inhibition. Ten epidemiology studies on the association between CYP2D6 genotype and breast cancer recurrence report widely heterogeneous results with relative-risk estimates outside the range of reasonable bounds. None of the explanations proposed for the heterogeneity of these results adequately account for the variability and no design feature sets apart any study or subset of studies as most likely to be accurate. The studies reporting a positive association might receive the most attention, because they report a result consistent with the profile of metabolite concentrations; not because they are more reliable by design. We argue that a recommendation for CYP2D6 genotyping of candidates for tamoxifen therapy, and its implicit conclusion regarding the association between genotype and recurrence risk, is premature.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Drug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGenotypeHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Receptors, EstrogenTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID19647203
PMCPMC2895727
OpenAlexW1965111408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.