Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19644760›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2009

Quantum dots as new-generation fluorochromes for FISH: an appraisal.

Dimitris Ioannou, Helen G Tempest, Benjamin M Skinner, Alan R Thornhill, Michael Ellis, Darren K Griffin

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applications of Quantum Dots in Preventive Oncology.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Review
  2. Antibody Self-Assembly Maximizes Cytoplasmic Immunostaining Accuracy of Compact Quantum Dots.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of Gold Nanoparticle and Fluorophore-conjugated Antibodies for Labeling Epitopes in Permeabilized Cells.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitris IoannouDepartment of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Helen G Tempest
Benjamin M Skinner
Alan R Thornhill
Michael Ellis
Darren K Griffin
University of Kent · GBDigital Scientific (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E010652/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council G19438/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of nanotechnology, quantum dots (QDs) are a novel class of inorganic fluorochromes composed of nanometre-scale crystals made of a semiconductor material. Given the remarkable optical properties that they possess, they have been proposed as an ideal material for use in fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH). That is, they are resistant to photobleaching and they excite at a wide range of wavelengths but emit light in a very narrow band that can be controlled by particle size and thus have the potential for multiplexing experiments. The principal aim of this study was to compare the potential of QDs against traditional organic fluorochromes in both indirect (i.e. QD-conjugated streptavidin) and direct (i.e. synthesis of QD-labelled FISH probes) detection methods. In general, the indirect experiments met with a degree of success, with FISH applications demonstrated for chromosome painting, BAC mapping and use of oligonucleotide probes on human and avian chromosomes/nuclei. Many of the reported properties of QDs (e.g. brightness, 'blinking' and resistance to photobleaching) were observed. On the other hand, signals were more frequently observed where the chromatin was less condensed (e.g. around the periphery of the chromosome or in the interphase nucleus) and significant bleed-through to other filters was apparent (despite the reported narrow emission spectra). Most importantly, experimental success was intermittent (sometimes even in identical, parallel experiments) making attempts to improve reliability difficult. Experimentation with direct labelling showed evidence of the generation of QD-DNA constructs but no successful FISH experiments. We conclude that QDs are not, in their current form, suitable materials for FISH because of the lack of reproducibility of the experiments; we speculate why this might be the case and look forward to the possibility of nanotechnology forming the basis of future molecular cytogenetic applications.

Indexed as

Quantum DotsAnimalsBiotinBiotinylationCarbocyaninesCell NucleusCells, CulturedChickensChromosome PaintingChromosomesChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, Human, Pair 12Clone CellsDigoxigeninDNAFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateBiotinCarbocyaninescyanine dye 3DAPIDigoxigeninDNAFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateFluorescent DyesIndicators and ReagentsIndolesOligonucleotide ProbesStreptavidinTexas redXanthenes

Identifiers

PMID19644760
OpenAlexW2095943682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.